SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1711

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Dr. Mandaji Sridhar, S/o. Mandaji Sriramulu – Petitioner 
Versus
Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences, Rep. By Registrar Evaluation and Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 9258 of 2025 (EDN-RES) 
Decided On : 01-04-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Smt. Sumana Baliga M., Advocate
For the Respondents:Smt. Mamatha G. Kulkarni, Advocate.

Rounding off percentages in academic evaluations to the nearest whole number is permissible and not equivalent to awarding grace marks, supported by precedents.

Headnote:(A) Regulations governing postgraduate education - Writ petitions regarding rounding off percentage of marks from 49.25% to 50% - The Court reiterated the principle from DR.K.SREE LAXMI's case, allowing for rounding off of marks in specific circumstances. (Paras 3, 9, 10)

(B) Grace marks vs. Rounding Off - The Court noted that rounding off percentage is arithmetically consistent with standard practices and does not equate to providing grace marks. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, having secured 49.25% in the PG examination, seeks to benefit from rounding off to 50%, citing prior judgments as support. Respondent contends this practice should not apply following a policy change post-COVID-19.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner is entitled to rounding off the percentage to 50%.

Issues: Whether rounding off constitutes grace marks and the applicability of earlier judgments on this matter.

Ratio Decidendi: It was established that the rounding off is an arithmetical adjustment and should be applied consistently as per previous rulings.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for rounding off marks (Para 1 , 3)
2. contentions of respondent against rounding off (Para 4 , 5)
3. previous judgments establish rounding off principle (Para 6 , 7)
4. court’s reasoning on rounding off as mathematical adjustment (Para 8)

ORDER :

S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

In this petition, petitioner seeks for following reliefs :

“i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent to consider the marks awarded to the petitioner for the examination in the discipline of MD in General Medicine, held in January 2025, conducted by the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences by rounding off the marks from 49.25% to 50% as per the decision of this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.6113/2025 vide Annexure-E and declare petitioner as “PASS”.

ii) Direct the respondent to issue fresh marks card after rounding off the marks from 49.25% to 50%.

iii) Grant such other relief/s that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the matter.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent No.1 – RGUHS and learned counsel for respondent No.2 – National Medical Council of India and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that after completing of his MBBS Degree, the petitioner joined Post Graduation Course in General Medicine in BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, which is affiliated to the first respondent – RGUHS. In January 2025, the first respondent – RGUHS conducted Post Graduation examination, in which, the petitioner obtained 49.25% marks in theory paper. It is the specific contention of the petitioner that in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of DR.K.SREE LAXMI V/S. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND ANOTHER in W.P.No.3438/2025 and Connected Matters dated 24.02.2025, this Court has come to the conclusion that the petitioner would be entitled to rounding off the percentage of marks of 49.25% obtained by her to be rounded off to 50% which would enable her to pass the examination. It is therefore submitted that present writ petition also deserves to be allowed and dispose of in terms of the aforesaid judgment in DR.K.SREE LAXMI’s case supra.

4. Per contra, learned counsel Smt. Mamatha G. Kulkarni, for respondent No.1 – RGUHS would reiterate the various contentions urged in the statement of objections and submits that there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is an undisputed fact as borne out from the material on record that the petitioner obtained 49.25% in the examinations taken by her in January-2025. The question / issue as to whether a student obtaining 49.25% / 49.50% / 49.75% in Post Graduation examinations conducted by the first respondent – RGUHS can be rounded off to 50% so as to enable a student to passing percentage of marks came up for consideration before this Court in DR.K.SREE LAXMI’s case supra, wherein it is held as under:

ORAL ORDER

Since all these writ petitions involve common questions, the writ petitions are taken up together.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the conduct of the respondents in not rounding off the percentage to the next nearest number and not extending the benefit of rounding off to the petitioners.

3. In W.P.No.3438/2025, the petitioner is seeking an appropriate writ / order or direction:

“Declaring the Petitioner as “Pass” in the examination in the discipline of MD Pediatric examination conducted by RGUHS held in January 2025 by rounding off the marks from 49.75% to 50% as per the decision made by this Hon’ble court in W.P. No.11348/2020, W.A. 547/2021 & R.P. 384/2021 and as per the decision of Syndicate meeting held on 12-11-2020.”

In W.P.No.3443/2025, the petitioner is seeking an appropriate writ / order or direction:

“declaring the Petitioner as “Pass” in the examination in the discipline of MD General Medicine examination

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top