Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAVI V. HOSMANI
M.S. Nataraj, S/o. M.P. Sreekantaiah – Appellant
Versus
S. Nagalakshmi, W/o. M.V. Subbakrishna – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVI V. HOSMANI, J.
Challenging judgment and decree dated 07.07.2010 passed by Senior Civil Judge, Nanjangud, in R.A.no.44/2008, this appeal is filed.
2. Brief facts as stated are, appellant was plaintiff filed OS no.150/2005 for permanent injunction restraining defendant no.1, her agents etc. from interfering with plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of site no.99, measuring East to West 45ft. and North to South 30ft., situated at Devirammanahalli, Nanjangud Taluk, ('suit property' for short).
3. In plaint, it was stated, plaintiff purchased suit property from defendant no.2, under registered sale deed dated 26.04.1990, executed by defendant no.3 - General Power of Attorney ('GPA' for short). Thereafter revenue records were standing in name of plaintiff, he was paying taxes regularly and was in possession. And when plaintiff visited suit property, a week prior to suit, defendant no.1 represented to plaintiff that she had purchased suit property from defendant no.2 under registered sale deed executed by defendant no.3, in 1990. On verification, he found defendant no.1 had purchased site no.100, measuring East to West 40 ft. and North to South 51 + 22/2 ft., from def
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
