SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Kar) 175

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Shivashankar Amarannavar, J.
Sri Sudhakara K E, S/O. K.C. Eshwar Gowda - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Karnataka By N.R. Pura Police Station - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 17349 of 2025 (439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS)) C/W Criminal Petition No. 17351 of 2025
Decided On : 14-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri Sunil Kumar B N, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri Rahul Rai K, HCGP

The court upheld the necessity of preserving evidence in serious allegations while allowing anticipatory bail to an accused with no direct involvement in the crime.

Headnote:(A) BNSS - Sections 80(2), 103(1), 85, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Bail and anticipatory bail - Accused No.2's bail dismissed due to ongoing investigation for murder and dowry death - Accused No.4 granted anticipatory bail under strict conditions as no direct involvement was established during the incident. (Paras 1, 7, 8)

(B) Investigation - Court must consider the potential for evidence tampering and interference when evaluating bail applications in serious offences. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The deceased was subjected to harassment by accused Nos.1 to 3, culminating in her death following a forced consumption of pesticides. Accused No.4 had no allegations against her during the days of the incident and lives separately.

Findings of Court:
Dismissal of bail for direct accused, allowing anticipatory bail for accused No.4 with conditions.

Issues: The main issues include allegations of dowry demands and the safety of the ongoing investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the significance of evidence preservation and the seriousness of the allegations in refusing bail to the more implicated accused while recognizing the lack of evidence against accused No.4.

Result: Petitions dismissed except for anticipatory bail granted to accused No.4.

Table of Content
1. petitions filed for bail and anticipatory bail. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding bail applications. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court's review of evidence. (Para 5)
4. assessment of bail based on investigation status. (Para 6)
5. court's final orders on bail. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR, J.

Criminal Petition No.17349/2025 is filed by accused No.2 under Section 483 of BNSS seeking to grant bail and Criminal Petition No.17351/2025 is filed by accused Nos.3 and 4 under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail. Both petitions are filed in respect of Crime No.88/2025 of N.R Pura Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 80(2), 103(1), 85, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent –State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners would contend that there was love and affection by accused No.2 towards his daughter-in-law and therefore, he had earlier transferred Rs.12,000/- on 29.03.2025 and Rs.36,000/- on 19.05.2025 and therefore, there is no question of any demand of dowry by him. Accused No.2 has admitted the deceased to hospital and paid the hospital bill to the extent of Rs.2,18,600/-. Accused No.2 is retired employee, aged 63 years. Accused No.3 is the mother-in-law of the deceased and she is aged 60 years and she had underwent heart surgery (bypass) on 26.04.2005. The inquest mahazar indicate that the deceased has sustained seven simple injuries and they are aberrations. Accused No.4 who is sister-in-law of the deceased and daughter of accused Nos.2 and 3 is married and she is residing in the house of her husband at Bidaragudu Village of Thirthahalli Taluk and accused Nos.1 to 3 and deceased were residing in Mavinakere village of N.R.Pura Taluk. There is no allegation against accused No.4 present on the days of incident i.e., 27.10.2025 and 28.10.2025. The major portion of investigation is over. On these grounds, he prayed to allow petitions.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent –State would contend that the investigation is in progress. The offence alleged against petitioners is murder of the deceased. The post mortem report indicates that the deceased has sustained 30 injuries. The investigation is in progress. The cause of death is yet to be ascertained. The marriage of the deceased with accused No.1 was performed during June 2023 and the death of the deceased is within 07 years of her marriage. The allegation against petitioners is demand of dowry. If petitioners are granted bail/anticipatory bail, there are chances of they hampering the investigation and tampering the prosecution witnesses. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard learned counsels, the Court has perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed on record.

6. The marriage of deceased –Pooja with accused No.1 -Sharath has taken place during June 2023. They had son aged 02 years. The deceased was residing with accused Nos.1 to 3 in their house at Mavinakere Village in N.R.Pura Taluk. As per averments of the complaint, the allegation against accused persons is that they used to harass the deceased mentally and physically, demanding dowry. As per averments of the complaint on 27.10.2025 at about 09.00 p.m., accused Nos.1 to 3 have assaulted the deceased. On the next day, that is Tuesday morning, again accused Nos.1 to 3 assaulted her on her face and as the deceased screamed, neighbours came and the accused persons sent them back as nothing had happened and on the same day at about 06.30 a.m., accused persons forcibly made the deceased to consume pesticides. When she started screaming they took her to hospital at N.R.Pura and thereafter, took her to Shivamogga for further treatment. The deceased died on 30.10.2025. As per averments of the complainant, the brother of the deceased met the deceased in the hospital befor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top