IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
D.C. Aravind S/o Late D.A. Chandregowda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka Represented By Station House Officer of Hassan Extention Police Station – Respondent
ORDER :
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
1. Petitioners are before the Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. Issue a writ of certiorari to quash the summons dated 30.09.2025 issued by 3rd Respondent (Annexure-E and F) and;
ii. Issue a writ of certiorari and quash the report dated 30.08.2025 filed by the R2 (Annexure-C) and;
iii. Issue a writ of certiorari and quash the preventive Action Report No.79/2025 dated 18.09.2025 registered by R1 (Annexure D) and consequently quash the entire proceedings in FAR No.79/2025 pending on the file of the Taluk Magistrate, Hassan Taluk, Hassan District and;
iv. Pass such other and further orders as deemed fit in light of the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.
2. The petitioners claim to be the Office Bearers of Malnad Technical Education Society, Hassan. The main objective of the said society is to establish and run various educational institutions such as Colleges, Schools, Hostels, etc., in Hassan. The term of the office of the Executive Committee is five years; an election was held on 11.01.2025 under the Chairman of the senior most member. Certain persons having been elected to the various posts for a period of five years, the
Madhu Limaye Vs. Ved Murti and others
Sri Rustom Kerawala vs. State of Karnataka by Varthur Police Station and Anr.
Compliance with statutory procedures is mandatory in issuing summons under the BNSS, 2023. Failure to issue a prior written order under Section 130 invalidates subsequent actions, ensuring protection....
The court emphasized the necessity for judicial application of mind in issuing notices under preventive sections to protect personal liberty and avoid abuse of process.
Orders related to preventive action require strict adherence to procedural law, including the disclosure of all relevant particulars; failure to do so renders the orders unsustainable.
Executive Magistrate must pass written order under Section 130 BNSS setting forth substance of information before issuing show cause under Section 126; mechanical notices insufficient and confer no j....
The court established that a magistrate must provide an opportunity for the accused to be heard before taking cognizance of criminal complaints, ensuring adherence to procedural justice under Section....
An Executive Magistrate can initiate proceedings under S. 107 Cr.P.C. without a prior incident if there is a likelihood of a breach of peace.
The court clarified that Section 175(4) of the BNSS is discretionary, not mandatory, allowing the Magistrate to independently decide on investigations without undue influence from prior orders.
Failure to comply with procedural safeguards in the registration of FIR against public servants, specifically ignoring the necessity of a report from a superior officer, renders the Magistrate's orde....
A Magistrate must examine the complainants and witnesses before issuing notices to the accused under Section 223(1) of BNSS, 2023, ensuring compliance with procedural mandates.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.