SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1931

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
G.BASAVARAJA, J.
 
Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Presently Bangalore Zonal Unit – Appellant
Versus
R. Subhash, S/o. D. Rangaswamy – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.400 Of 2012
Decided On : 19-12-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Umesh P.B., Adv.
Respondent: Sri. Amar Correa, Adv.

The prosecution failed to prove the possession of narcotics and did not comply with mandatory statutory requirements, leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Headnote:(A) Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c), 21, 27A, 28, 43 - Acquittal of accused - The prosecution failed to prove the possession of 5.800 kgs of heroin by the accused and did not comply with mandatory provisions of Section 42, rendering search and seizure invalid - The trial court held that the evidence from official witnesses lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. (Paras 9, 11, 12, 18, 36)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 313 - Examination of accused - No defence evidence was led, and the accused denied the charges during examination.

(C) Evidentiary Standards - The court emphasized that voluntary statements must be proven to be made without coercion, and failure to follow procedural mandates led to the dismissal of the appeal. (Paras 24, 27, 36)

Facts of the case:
The accused was arrested while allegedly possessing heroin, which was seized by the NCB. The trial court acquitted the accused due to procedural violations and lack of substantiation. (Paras 3, 4, 5, 11)

Findings of Court:
The trial court found significant discrepancies in the seizure process and held that the prosecution did not meet evidentiary burdens required by law. (Paras 36, 37)

Issues: The main issues were the legality of the search and the prosecution's failure to prove possession and compliance with statutory requirements. (Paras 14, 18)

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that the mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act must be strictly adhered to, and evidence presented must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 18, 36)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. introduction to appellant and respondent (Para 1 , 2)
2. background of the drug trafficking case (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. charges and prosecution evidence overview (Para 10)
4. contentions from both parties (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. re-examination of evidence by appellate court (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. final judgment on the lack of evidence (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

G. BASAVARAJA, J.

1. The appellant-Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control, Bureau, South Zonal unit, Chennai, has preferred this appeal against the order dated 14th October, 2011 password in Special Case No.46 of 2005 by the Principal Sessions Judge at Tumkur (for short "the trial Court").

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.

3. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that Caleb Arumairaj, Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, South Zonal Unit, Chennai, on 04th December 2004 at 5:30 pm received credible information over phone that one Balakrishnan @ Krishnan (A4) then at Central Prison, Bangalore for NDPS cases, is indulging in drug trafficking and has arranged to procured six kilograms of heroine from North India through one Shekhar (A6) who has to bring the said consignment to Bangalore. Balakrishnan has also arranged one Subhash resident of Bangalore to collect the said drug from Shekhar. The delivery spot was fixed on the road between Tumkur and Bangalore on 05th December 2004. Subhash, on receipt of the drug from Shekhar, was to handover the same to Antony Raj Alias John of Nagercoil (A3) at Bangalore on the instruction of Balakrishnan. John, on receipt of drug from Subhash, is to smuggle the same to Sri Lanka on the instruction of Balakrishnan. Rajaratnam Alias Ravi (A5-now dead) brother of Balakrishnan, is also associated with smuggling of drugs. Subhash is going to Tumkur on 5th December 2004 in a Maruti van bearing registration number KA-01/M-6994 to collect the narcotic drug. Thereafter, PW3-Caleb Arumairaj submitted information to Gunabalan-Superintendent. The Superintendent called Arumaraj and another Intelligence Officer, Thirumalai Sridhar and discussed about the information. Then on the night of 04th December 2004, Gunabalan, along with Arumaraj and Thirumalai Sridhar, Shankar Kumar, Intelligence Officers, and Naqvi, Tax Assistant, proceeded in the department vehicle to Tumkur. On 5th December 2004 at about 2.00 pm, Thirumalai Sridhar and two witnesses at JOSS Toll Gate Plaza, Chokkanahalli said that they have agreed to be witnesses for the search proceedings under the NDPS Act. They kept waiting for the vehicle and at 4.00 pm, they noticed Maruti Omni bearing registration No.KA-01/M-6994 as mentioned in the information, and they stopped the vehicle.

4. Investigating officer-Thirumalai Sridhar, introduced himself to the occupants of the van by showing his ID and enquired about them. The person seated on the front left seat revealed his name as Subhash. The driver of Omni said his name is Mahendra Kumar. Thirumalai Sridhar told them about the information received and informed that they have to conduct search of vehicle and he also told them that they have right to exercise that search to be conducted in the presence of a Magistrate or a Gazetted officer. Then, Thirumalai Sridhar enquired Subhash and Mahendra Kumar, whether they were in possession of any narcotic drug to which Subhash replied in the affirmative, took out the white coloured polythene sack and handed it over to Thirumalai Sridhar from the rear seat and told that it contain heroine. Thirumalai Sridhar opened the sack and found it contained 11 brown coloured packets wrapped together in an adhesive tape and upon opening the packet, found brown coloured powder in it. All the 11 packets were containing brown coloured powder and from which a small quantity was drawn for testing purpose. All the 11 packets put- together weighed 5.800 kilograms. Then Thirumalai Sridhar seized the narcotic drug under the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top