SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1953

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
M. Nagaprasanna, J.
Torrent Solar Power Private Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Power Grid Koppal Gadag - Respondent
Writ Petition No.104896 OF 2025 (GM - RES)
Decided On : 15-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri K.N.Phanindra, Sr.Advocate A/W, Sri Santosh Kumar B.Malligawad, Advocate, Sri Sunayana Basu Mallik And, Sri Arfatu Azam, Advocates
For the Respondent:Sri Pramod Nair, Sr. Advocate For Sri M.S.Hallikeri, Advocate

The court emphasized that electric transmission lines serve a higher public interest, and unilateral alterations by the petitioner to WTG locations are impermissible without approval.

Headnote:(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 68(1), 164 - Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10 - Public interest - Power Grid has the authority to lay transmission lines without interference from the petitioner who shifted WTG locations unilaterally, causing conflict with transmission infrastructure. (Paras 4, 11, 12, 13)

(B) Regulations - Central Electricity Authority (Measures Relating to Safety and Electricity Supply) Regulations, 2023 - Regulation 63 mandates transmission lines not to pass near buildings, with windmills classified as buildings under such regulation. (Paras 4, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a solar power company, sought to re-route transmission lines that conflicted with its WTG installations. The respondent, Power Grid, had approvals for transmission that clashed with the petitioner's unilateral shifting of WTG locations, leading to legal confrontation.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the actions of Power Grid are in line with public interest and the petitioner lacked the authority to shift its WTG locations without necessary approvals.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was whether the respondent's establishment of transmission lines was legal and arbitrary, thereby justifying judicial intervention.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the respondent’s acts were lawful and necessary for public interest, and the unilateral shifting by the petitioner led to the current dispute, hence, the petition was rejected.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. detailed background of power project and approvals. (Para 2)
2. contrasting arguments of parties regarding wtg locations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis of public interest in transmission lines. (Para 6 , 7 , 12)
4. supreme court's rationale on transmission lines' legality. (Para 10)
5. final decision rejecting the petition. (Para 13)

ORDER :

M. Nagaprasanna, J.

The petitioner is at the doors of this Court seeking the following reliefs:

“i. Issue a writ order or direction of mandamus or in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to re-route the Extra High Voltage ("EHV") Lines without interrupting any work, erections, etc. within the distance of 227 meters of the Petitioner's land parcels as per Ministry of New and Renewable Energy ("MNRE") Guidelines at WTG Locations as per coordinates morefully detailed in the map/sketch (Annexure-R)

ii. Issue a writ order or direction of certiorari or in the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside the letters dated 01/04/2025 number reference bearing by SRTS- II/PKGT L/Gadag TLC/2024-25/273 (Annexure- S), the letter dated 07/02/2025 bearing reference number PKGTL-Gadag/TLC/Torrent/255 (Annexure-P) sent Respondent to the Petitioner asking to relocate the WTG Locations along with the connected communication dated 06/02/2025 (Annexure-N);

iii. Issue a writ order or direction of mandamus or in the nature of mandamus restraining the Respondent from issuing any directions to, or otherwise in any manner seeking to compel a change in the WTG Locations and further restrain the Respondent from in any manner interfering with the business and activities/Project of the Petitioner; and iv. Pass such orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present writ petition.”

2. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:

2.1. The petitioner - Torrent Solar Power Pvt. Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Company’ for short) is a Company established in the year 2020, as an integrated power utility, having its business or interest in power generation, transmission, distribution and supply of power cables and operates wind power generation projects at various places. The respondent is the Power Grid Koppal Gadag Transmission Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Power Grid’ for short) a wholly owned subsidiary of the Power Grid Corporation of India. Power Grid is incorporated as a special purpose vehicle of the Government of India for transmission. In the years 2021-2022, the petitioner is said to have conducted a deliberation with the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) for setting of 300.3 MW. Wind power project, which is proposed to be established in the villages of Yalaburga and Koppal Taluk of Koppal District. After the deliberations, it transpires that the petitioner submits an application to the Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited (KREDL) as per the MNRE guidelines, requesting for allotment of 300.3 MW. wind power project under the Inter-State Transmission System (ISTS) category at various places.

2.2. Pursuant to the said deliberation, the petitioner is said to have prepared a detailed project report for the project for the purpose of enquiry or investigation into the feasibility of the project and is submitted to KREDL. The particulars of the locations and the project including the latitude and longitude of the land requirement, the tentative survey numbers, the tentative village names, the height of the wind mast for each proposed site and the tentative project schedule are said to have been submitted by the petitioner.

2.3. The Government, in terms of its order dated 23-02-2022, accorded an in-principle approval to the project of the petitioner by issuance of a Government order, pursuant to which, the petitioner enters into an agreement with KREDL, agreeing to complete the project by 22-02-2028. Between 27-04-2023 and 29-11-2023, the petitioner secured conversion of agricultural lands into non-agricultural purposes, a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top