Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T.ASHA
Progen Renewables Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Power Grid Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis for the writ petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. respondents' justification of actions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's deliberations on applicable law. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. conclusion: writ petition is dismissed. (Para 31) |
ORDER :
P.T.ASHA, J.
The above writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus to forbear the respondents 1 to 3 from erecting Transmission Towers / Lines in the petitioner’s lands bearing S.F.No.351/1 and 353/2A Kasthurirengapuram, Part I Village, Rathapuram Taluk,, Tirunelveli District which is against the 6th respondent’s Load Flow Study dated 27.11.2025 and without following the provisions of the Electricity act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885.
Petitioner’s case:
2. It is the contention of the petitioner that they are a Private Limited Company engaged in the production of wind energy and the supply of power to its group captive consumers within the State of Tamil Nadu. As the State of Tamil Nadu has more number of sunny days and is a forerunner in solar power generation and other non- conventi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
