Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Siddappa S/o Late Erappa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
The petitioners/defendants 1 to 5 who are the judgments debtors are at the doors of this Court calling in question entire proceedings pertaining to compromise decree dated 27-08-2011 passed in O.S.No.591 of 2011 and as a consequence thereof call in question entire execution proceedings in E.P.No.38 of 2012 and also seek a direction to reopen O.S.No.591 of 2011.
2. Heard Sri R.K. Masur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Smt. Rashmi Rao, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4, Sri H.L.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6 and Sri M.V. Vedachala, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.7.
3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows: -
3.1. Before embarking upon consideration of the issue involved, I deem it appropriate to notice the protagonists to the lis. The 1st petitioner is one Siddappa, judgment debtor No.1, repository of the family; petitioner No.2 one Smt. Nagarathnamma, judgment debtor No.2 is the wife of the 1st petitioner; petitioner No.3, Smt. Nethravathi S, judgment debtor No.3; petitioner No.4, Smt. Nirmalamma, judgment No.4 and petitioner No.5, Smt. Renuka, judgment No.5 are al
Compromise decrees can be set aside only upon strict proof of fraud; the obligation of non-alienation does not invalidate agreements for future transactions after the stipulated period. Schools of le....
(1) Compromise of suit – To recall a compromise that has been recorded would call for strong reasons. Terms of a compromise decree cannot be avoided, unless allegation of fraud has been proved.(2) Wh....
Challenges to compromise decrees based on fraud must be made in the court that issued the decree, and such allegations require substantial proof.
Lok Adalat compromise decrees, though final under Section 21, can be set aside in writ jurisdiction if vitiated by fraud like non-service of summons and misrepresentation to illiterate disabled party....
The main legal point established is the requirement for registration of decrees creating new rights in immovable property and the prohibition on alienation of migrant property without following legal....
(1) Agreement to sell does not confer any title or ownership qua immovable property in favour of a person.(2) Agreement to sell does not confer any title or ownership qua immovable property in favour....
Point of Law : Challenge to the award of Lok Adalat can be done only by filing a writ petition under Article 226 and/or Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the High Court and that too on very....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
