Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Jinu Varghese K.V. – Appellant
Versus
Board of Directors of Canara Bank, Ernakulam – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
“That in the facts and circumstances mentioned above it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
a) To declare that the Annex-F/notification dated 29-05-2015, in unmistakable terms, declares that the MSME-borrower has no obligation to make an application for resolution of stress and, on the contrary, that banks and financial institutions are duty-bound to identify incipient stress based on the illustrative signs indicated in to the Annex-G/RBI 2015-16/338 Circular dated 17-03-2016 Bearing No. FIDD.MSME & NFS.BC.NO.21/06-02.31/2015-16 and further, that in any case where the bank has failed to identify incipient stress, it is duty-bound to classify the account as SMA-1 if the default is more than 31 days and as SMA-2 if the default is more than 61 days, and thereafter shall constitute a Committee and make a reference to that Committee for resolution of stress; and further, that the Committee is empowered to permit recovery in terms of Para 5(3)(iv) if the resolution of stress is not feasible;
b) In furtherance of prayer (a) above, to declare that the judgments of the Supreme Court i
The jurisdiction of a writ petition must align with the location where the cause of action arises, not merely the respondent's address.
Banks must follow MSME Notification procedures to identify stress in accounts before classifying them as NPAs. Failure to do so legitimizes subsequent enforcement measures under the SARFAESI Act.
The classification of accounts as Non-Performing Assets (NPA) under the SARFAESI Act is valid if MSMEs do not timely assert their status, failing to invoke protections under the MSMED Act's revival f....
The High Court should not exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 in matters governed by the SARFAESI Act where effective remedies exist, and classification of accounts as NPAs is not subject to judi....
Financial institutions must follow statutory procedures when dealing with MSME classification and recovery; non-compliance can render actions invalid, emphasizing the need for judicial adherence to e....
Court dismissed petitions citing abuse of legal process due to repetitive filings with identical prayers, thus underscoring judicial efficiency principles.
Financial institutions must follow statutory procedures when dealing with MSME classification and recovery; non-compliance can render actions invalid, emphasizing the need for judicial adherence to e....
Timely assertion of MSME status is essential to invoke protections against loan enforcement actions; delays may bar legal recourse.
A registered MSME must disclose its status before NPA classification to invoke protections under relevant frameworks; failure to do so precludes later challenges to recovery actions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
