Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Sree Gururaja Enterprises Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Cimec Enterprises – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed to challenge a prior court order. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the necessity of staying proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. background on related suits and judicial decisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusions on judicial consistency and res judicata. (Para 15 , 16 , 22) |
| 5. clarification of section 10 cpc application. (Para 18 , 20) |
ORDER :
1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed with a prayer to set-aside the order dated 25.07.2018 passed on IA No.5 in O.S.No.6942/20
The court clarified the application of Section 10 of CPC, emphasizing that only substantively identical issues warrant a stay to prevent parallel proceedings.
Section 10 of the CPC requires complete identity of subject matter for staying proceedings in concurrent suits; conflicting properties undermine the applicability of this provision.
Section 10 of the Code prevents trial of a suit if the matter is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit involving the same parties, which was not met here.
Consolidation of suits under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure is permissible if the suits involve common questions of law and fact, and consolidation would avoid conflicting opinions and ser....
The principle of res judicata bars re-litigation of matters already decided, confirming that the earlier judgment is binding and the current suit is not maintainable.
Power conferred on Courts under Rule 3 of Order 17 of CPC to decide suit on merits for default of a party is a drastic power which seriously restricts remedy of unsuccessful party for redress.
Section 10 is to avoid two parallel trials on same issue by two Courts and to avoid recording of conflicting findings on issues which are directly and substantially in issue in previously instituted ....
Trial courts must adjudicate all issues in a suit, and failure to do so violates procedural requirements under CPC, necessitating remand.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article