SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2149

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Sree Ganapathi Vidya Samsthe (R) - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 21699 of 2025 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 03-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Srikanth M. P., Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri. Manjunath K., HCGP

Educational institutions cannot be discriminated against in medium of instruction; both government and aided schools have equal rights under constitutional provisions.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Articles 14, 19(1)(a)(g), 21, and 21A of the Constitution - Discrimination between government and private aided educational institutions regarding the medium of instruction - Petitioner seeks permission to convert sections in 8th, 9th, and 10th standards from Kannada to English - The Court found that the impugned endorsement was cryptic and unreasoned, violating principles of natural justice. (Paras 3, 6, 8, 10)

(B) Natural Justice - An endorsement must be reasoned; arbitrary actions violating legal principles warrant judicial intervention. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, operating a high school in Kannada medium, sought to convert instruction in certain sections to English but faced rejection from authorities without sufficient reasoning.

Findings of Court:
The endorsement rejecting the application was quashed, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration with directions to issue necessary documents for running both mediums.

Issues: The court addressed issues of discrimination against aided institutions and the necessity of reasoned administrative decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held there is no statutory bar preventing educational institutions from adopting both mediums if permitted to government institutions.

Result: Writ petition allowed, endorsement quashed, and direction to issue modified registration certificates.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks relief for medium conversion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. contentions regarding procedural flaws. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. statutory provisions for registration and changes. (Para 7)
4. rationale for equality in medium instruction. (Para 8 , 9)
5. court's directive to quash endorsement. (Para 10)

ORDER :

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

(a) Hold and declare that the State cannot discriminate with the Government Educational Institutions in respect of Private Aided Educational Institutions with regards to Medium of Instructions in the Schools registered and recognized under the provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, failing which, it would amount to violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a)(g), 21 and 21A of the Constitution.

(b) Hold and declare that the stand of the respondents in denying conversion of One Section each in 8th, 9th and 10th Standards from existing Kannada Medium to English Medium as purely arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 (1)(a)(g), 21 and 21A of the Constitution.

(c) Hold and declare that the existing Private Aided Educational Institutions are entitled to seek conversion of the Medium of Instructions from Kannada Medium to English Medium considering the need of the children and the parents as per the rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(a)(g), 21 and 21A of the Constitution.

(d) Quash the Endorsement bearing No.AA NU2 NYA DAA HU BA.29/2024-25/389 dated 13.05.2025 by the 4th respondent vide Annexure-AC.

(e) Direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the proposal dated 11.02.2023 regarding change of medium to English from Kannada Medium insofar as each section of 8th, 9th and 10th Standards in Ganapathi High School, Hebbur run by the petitioner management in accordance with Rule 7 and Form No.III and IV of the Karnataka Educational Institutions (Classification and Registration) Rules, 1997 vide Annexure-J and KCSRs, Circular dated 05.09.2015 issued by the Government in furtherance of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court vide Annexure-L bearing No.ED 359 PGC 2015.

(f) Consequential relief or any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity.

2. Heard learned counsel Sri.M.P.Srikanth for petitioner and Sri.Manjunath K., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondents and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of material on record will indicate that the petitioner is running an aided High School at Hebbur, Tumkur Taluk and District for classes 8th, 9th and 10th in Kannada medium. The petitioner conducts classes in two sections each in 8th, 9th and 10th Standards and intends to convert one section each into English medium. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a request/application to the respondents who rejected the same, as a result of which, the petitioner approached this Court in W.P.No.12849/2024 which was allowed vide final order dated 21.04.2025 by remitting the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration afresh, in accordance with law, as hereunder:

“In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

“a) Quash the Endorsement bearing No.AA PRA SHA SHI HIMBARAHA 26/2023-24 dated 13.02.2024 as issued by the 5th respondent vide Annexure-N.

b) Direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the proposal dated 11.02.2023 vide Annexure-J regarding change of medium to English from Kannada Medium insofar as each Section of 8th, 9th and 10th Standards in Ganapathi High School, Hebbur run by the petitioner management in accordance with Rule 7 and Form No.III and IV of the Karnataka Educational Institutions (Classification and Registration), Rules, 1997, Circular dated 05.09.2015 issued by the Government vide Annexure-L in furtherance of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court.

c) Consequential relief or any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top