Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Ivy Miller Chahal W/o Late Gurmail Singh Chahal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER :
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
WHEREFORE it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing the impugned email communications dated 07/10/2024, 20/11/2024, and 04/03/2025 sent by Respondent No. 3 produced at Annexures- M, P, and T, respectively, and further issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to make full reimbursement of the medical reimbursement claim of the Petitioner dated 26/12/2023 in respect of the CRT-D implantation of the late husband of the Petitioner as acknowledged by Respondent No. 3, as per their receipt/acknowledgement bearing MRC No. 3559/2023/BNGLR/BA04 as per Annexure- G, and allow this writ petition with costs, and grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. The Petitioner is a retired officer from the Indian Administrative Service from the Madhya Pradesh cadre, having retired in the year 2010. Her husband was working in the Madhya Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation as an Executi
In emergency medical situations, full reimbursement of medical expenses is mandated regardless of any imposed ceiling limits, emphasizing the right to timely medical treatment.
Emergency medical treatments require reimbursement even if provided by non-empanelled facilities, prioritizing the necessity of treatment over technical compliance with prescribed rates.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the state to ensure timely medical treatment and the need for a compassionate and sympathetic consideration of medical reimbursem....
The right to medical reimbursement for government employees cannot be denied due to hospital non-recognition or exceeding package limits if treatment necessity is established.
The denial of medical reimbursement for a heart transplant due to CGHS guidelines was unconstitutional, emphasizing individual health rights in critical situations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
