Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Soumya, W/o. Late Suresh Rao – Appellant
Versus
Ratnakumari, W/o. S. Baburao – Respondent
Key Points: - The Assistant Commissioner’s jurisdiction to issue eviction orders under Section 23 of the Act is debated and clarified. (!) (!) - Sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 23 have distinct consequences; eviction may be required to protect maintenance/rights, but not as a routine remedy. (!) (!) (!) - Supreme Court decisions (S Vanitha; Urmila Dixit) hold eviction can be ordered when necessary and expedient to protect a senior citizen’s rights, not as automatic remedy. (!) (!) (!) - The judgment references ancillary cases (Samtola Devi; Urmila Dixit; Anil v. Subhadra) to emphasize protective, not punitive, eviction within the Act’s objectives. (!) (!) (!) - The petitioner challenged an eviction order; the court upheld the order, noting the senior citizen was deprived of dwelling. (!) (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court observes need for careful examination of records and arguments. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. jurisdiction of assistant commissioner to pass eviction orders disputed. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER :
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
order under maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens act." data-page="3" data-para-type="facts" id="1">The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order dated 17.06.2025, passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Authority for Senior Citizens Tribunal, Ballari, under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), whereby, the Assistant Commissioner directs the petitioner to vacate the house, which is in possession of the petitioner and her children and hand it over the same to the first respondent - senior citizen.
order under maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens act." data-para-type="facts" id="2">2. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
The petitioner and the second respondent are both daughters in-law of the first respondent. The son of the first respondent – husband of the petitioner dies and the petitioner and her children and the first
The Assistant Commissioner has the authority to issue eviction orders under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, especially to ensure the protection and maintenance o....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 23(2) of the Senior Citizens Act, which empowers the Tribunal to order eviction of the occupant fr....
The Senior Citizens Act empowers the Tribunal to issue eviction orders to protect the rights and welfare of senior citizens, emphasizing the obligation of children to maintain their parents, includin....
Senior citizen, cannot seek eviction from separate residence of son in a building owned by him, under Senior Citizens Act – Son also cannot claim a right to residence in a building exclusively owned ....
Tribunal under Senior Citizens Act may order child's eviction from parent's property sans monetary maintenance claim if essential for senior citizen's residence and normal life, particularly after fo....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
