IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
G. BASAVARAJA
Ibrahim, S/O Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka Represented By Its Circle Inspector Of Police Rural Police Station – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G BASAVARAJA, J.
The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 04.06.2013 and order on sentence dated 06.06.2023 passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chikkamagalur, in S.C.No.73/2012.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to their rank as before the trial Court.
3. The brief facts leading to this appeal are that the Circle Inspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Chikkamagaluru, submitted a charge sheet against the accused for the offence under Sections 366 , 343, 376 IPC . It is alleged by the prosecution that CWs.4 and 5 are the parents of victim girl-CW1. They were residing in Attigundi and working as coolies. They have two daughters and one son. CW1 studied in the house of CW6 at Kolludoddi from 1st to 5th standard and thereafter, she used to go to Allampura School and was staying at Attigundi. CW1 used to go to the school by SMS private bus and the accused was the driver of the said bus. CW1 used to tell to her parents that accused used to tease her saying that he loves her and intends to marry her and that he will look after her well. Thus, he was insisting her to love him. When the accused t

Krishnan Kumar Mallik Vs. State of Haryana
K R Thimmappa Gowda Vs. State of Karnataka
The court found insufficient evidence to support a conviction for rape under Section 376 IPC, emphasizing that absence of injuries and contradictions in victim testimony critical to the case undermin....
Prosecution failed to sufficiently prove the victim's age or the alleged offences, resulting in the acquittal of the accused due to insufficient evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the procedure laid down in the Juvenile Justice Act and Rules for determining juvenility. The court emphasized the need....
The conviction under the POCSO Act was upheld due to credible victim testimony and corroborative evidence establishing aggravated sexual assault on a minor.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reliable evidence and corroboration in cases involving sexual offences, especially in the absence of conclusive evidence reg....
In cases of sexual offences, the prosecution must establish the age of the victim convincingly, as ambiguous evidence cannot sustain a conviction.
Kidnapping and rape – Reliance on emotional state of victim as a proxy for corroboration of allegations would be both legally unsound and procedurally inappropriate.
[The judgment establishes that corroborative evidence, including medical reports and witness testimonies, is crucial in sexual assault cases, particularly when the victim is a minor. The court emphas....
The court emphasized the necessity for the prosecution to prove the victim's age and elements of force beyond reasonable doubt in cases involving sexual offenses against minors.
The court emphasized that the school certificate is the best proof of age and followed the procedure under the Juvenile Justice Act to determine the age of the victim. The court held that consent is ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.