SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2236

G. A. SANAP
Wasim – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.N.Ali, Advocate, A.R.Chutke, Advocate, Kirti Deshpande, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. In this revision application, challenge is to the judgment and order dtd. 30/1/2015, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, whereby learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal filed by the applicant/accused against his conviction and sentence awarded by learned Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Yavatmal for the offence punishable under Ss. 341, 363, 366, 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC"). Learned Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, on conviction, had sentenced the accused to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Sec. 341 of the IPC, rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Sec. 363 of the IPC, rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence punishable under Sec. 366 of the IPC, rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence punishable under Sec. 376 of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Sec. 506 of the IPC. He was further sentenced on all the counts to pay the fine.

2. The facts are as follows: The prosecutrix, on the date of the incident, was around 14 years of age. She was residing with her mother at Ashok Nagar,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top