G. A. SANAP
Wasim – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. In this revision application, challenge is to the judgment and order dtd. 30/1/2015, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, whereby learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal filed by the applicant/accused against his conviction and sentence awarded by learned Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Yavatmal for the offence punishable under Ss. 341, 363, 366, 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC"). Learned Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, on conviction, had sentenced the accused to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Sec. 341 of the IPC, rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Sec. 363 of the IPC, rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence punishable under Sec. 366 of the IPC, rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence punishable under Sec. 376 of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Sec. 506 of the IPC. He was further sentenced on all the counts to pay the fine.
2. The facts are as follows: The prosecutrix, on the date of the incident, was around 14 years of age. She was residing with her mother at Ashok Nagar,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.