SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2642

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.I. Arun, J.
M/S. Biodiversity Conservation India Private Limited – Petitioner
Versus
M/S. Vista Itcl (India) Limited – Respondent
Criminal Petition No.4086 of 2019 (482 (Cr.PC)/528 (BNSS)), Criminal Petition No. 3273 of 2019 (482 (Cr.PC)/528 (BNSS))
Decided On : 10-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Sanket M Yenagi, Advocate (Through Vc)
For the Respondent:Sri. Manu Kulkarni, Advocate For Sri Madhur A. Kalyan Shetty, Advocate)

A notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must demand payment from the cheque drawer to the payee and not a third party, or it is deemed invalid.

Headnote:(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Offences relating to dishonoured cheques - Cognizance taken by Magistrate on defective notice demanding payment to a third party rather than the complainant, deemed invalid - Complaints quashed - Official Liquidator proceedings not precluding Section 138 actions against directors. (Paras 16-20)

(B) Validity of Notices - A notice under Section 138 must demand payment from the drawer to the payee directly; demands made to third parties are non-compliant with statutory requirements. (Paras 17-18)

Facts of the case:
Two criminal petitions were initiated against petitioners for dishonoured cheques issued for significant sums—over Rs. 15 crore. The respondent’s demand notices targeted a third party (debenture holder) rather than the petitioners.

Findings of Court:
Notices issued were held non-compliant with Section 138, quashing the ensuing complaints.

Issues: Whether a payee can demand payment for cheque dishonour to a third party without first demanding payment to himself.

Ratio Decidendi: Demands must comply with Section 138 by being directed to the payee, and any proceedings rely on validity of demand notices.

Result: Criminal petitions allowed, and proceedings quashed.

Table of Content
1. overview of petitions filed (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the cheques and their dishonor (Para 3 , 4)
3. notice demands and conditions under section 138 (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. failure to respond to notices (Para 8 , 9 , 11)
5. respondent's filings and legal standing (Para 10 , 14)
6. interpretation of section 138 compliance (Para 15 , 18)
7. validity of notices and complaints (Para 16 , 19)
8. conclusion and order of the court (Para 20)

ORDER :

M.I. ARUN, J.

1. The aforementioned criminal petitions are filed with the following prayers:

(a) The prayers in Crl.P.No.4086/2019 read as under:

"(A) To quash the order dated 05.11.2018, passed by the Court of XXVII ACMM, Bangalore, taking cognizance against the petitioners herein for the offences punishable under Section 138 of NI Act and issuing summons to the petitioners herein by registering the case in CC No.30012/2018, in the interest of justice and equity.

(B) To quash the proceedings in CC NO.30012/2018, on the file of Court of XXVII ACMM, Bangalore, in the interest of justice and equity.

(C) To pass such other orders/directions deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.”

(b) The prayers in Crl.P.No.3273/2019 read as under:

"(A) To quash the order dated 26.12.2016 passed by the Court of XXVII ACMM, Bangalore, taking cognizance against the petitioners herein for the offences punishable under Section 138 of NI Act and issuing summons to the petitioners herein by registering the case in CC No.28465/2016, in the interest of justice and equity.

(B) To quash the proceedings in CC NO.28465/2016, on the file of Court of XXVII ACMM, Bangalore, in the interest of justice and equity.

(C) To pass such other orders/directions deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Both the criminal petitions are taken up together for consideration as both pertain to the same transaction.

3. An agreement regarding Debenture Trust Deed has been created between M/s. IL&FS Trust Company Limited, which is the Debenture Trustee, which is now succeeded to by the respondent herein and M/s. BCIL Realty Private Limited, which is the Debenture Issuer and Dr. Chandrashekhar Hariharan & Mrs. Kanchan Kaur, who are the promoters & petitioner nos.2 and 3 herein and M/s. Biodiversity Conservation India Private Limited, who is the Guarantor and petitioner no.1 herein. As per the terms of the agreement, an escrow account was created in the name and style of M/s. BCIL Realty Private Limited escrow account bearing No.00410350000182 and the respondent was authorized to handle the said account. As per the terms, petitioner no.1-Guarantor issued the following four cheques in favour of M/s. BCIL Realty Private Limited, the details of which are as follows:

1. Cheque bearing No.000417 dated 13.06.2017 for a sum of Rs.5,82,00,000/-.

2. Cheque bearing No.000418 dated 19.06.2017 for a sum of Rs.5,82,00,000/-.

3. Cheque bearing No.000415 dated 27.06.2017 for a sum of Rs.3,90,00,000/-.

4. Cheque bearing No.000412 dated 22.08.2016 for a sum of Rs.2,60,00,000/-

4. The respondent, who was authorized to operate the account, deposited the same for realisation. However, they have been dishonoured for insufficiency of funds.

5. As per the terms of the agreement, the respondent was required to realise the said cheques and pay the same in turn to the debenture holder, which is M/s. Bennett Property Holdings Company Limited ('BPHCL' for short).

6. As contemplated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('the Act' for short), the respondent/payee issued a notice dated 24.08.2017 in respect of three cheques bearing Nos.000417, 000418 and 000415 to petitioner no.1 and its Directors (petitioner Nos.2 to 4) demanding payment of the amounts mentioned in the said cheques. However, while demanding the said payment, the respondent has demanded that the amounts be paid to BPHCL. The relevant paragraph in the notice reads as under:

"7. In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top