SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2701

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
H.P.SANDESH
Santhosha C.A., S/o C.L. Ananda – Appellant
Versus
Sujatha, W/o Late Shadakshari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri. Sanathkumar Shetty K., Advocate

JUDGMENT :

H.P. SANDESH, J.

This matter is listed for admission and I have heard learned counsel for the appellant.

2. This second appeal is filed against the concurrent finding of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court while seeking the relief of declaration, permanent injunction and alterative relief of possession is that the plaintiff and defendant Nos.2 and 3 are grand sons of late C.C. Laxmanappa, S/o. Chikkariyappa. The said Laxmanappa had five sons namely, C.L. Shekarappa, father of defendant Nos.2 and 3, C.L. Shadakshari defendant No.1, Smt. Rathnamma, C.L. Ananda father of plaintiff and C.L. Thimmappa. Shekarappa pre-deceased Laxmanappa. After demise of Shekarappa, his legal heirs defendant Nos.2 to 4, Laxmanappa and his remaining sons continued in joint family.

4. The plaintiff is working in a private company at Bengaluru. As such, he is not in a position to appear regularly before the Court. Hence, he has executed a GPA in favour of his mother Smt. Suma and suit is filed by his mother on behalf of the plaintiff. The suit schedule property is a joint family property of plaintiff and defendants. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top