Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
G.BASAVARAJA
Chandrashekar, S/o. Channappa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to trial court's order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's claims regarding gpa and allegations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments on behalf of appellants. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. overview of relevant provisions and fir details. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's analysis of prima facie cases. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. conclusion of the appeal. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT :
G. BASAVARAJA, J.
1. In this appeal appellant is challenging the order dated 19th September, 2025 passed in Criminal Misc.No.1524 of 2025 by the II Additional District & Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore (for short "the trial Court").
2. Facts in brief are that Anekal Police laid charge sheet against accused 1 and 2 and others for commission of offences punishable under Sections 336 (2), 338, 34092), 318(4), 352, 351(2), 351(3) read with Section 3 (5) of Indian Penal Code and submitted First Information Report to the Court. Accused 1 and 2, the appellants herein, have filed application under Section 482 of BNSS -2023 seeking anticipatory bail. Same came to be rejected by the impugned order. Being aggrieved by the order of rejection of anticipatory bail, the appellants have preferred t
The court reinforced that anticipatory bail cannot be granted when prima facie evidence shows violations of property rights under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) ....
The judgment established the need for a prima facie case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and emphasized caution in granting anticipatory bail und....
The court emphasized the need to carefully evaluate the entire material against the accused, strike a balance between no prejudice to investigation and unjustified detention, and consider reasonable ....
Section 18 bar on anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act inapplicable where FIR vaguely alleges caste abuse without specifics, revealing financial loan dispute; no custodial need if documents producible v....
Section 18 bar on anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act applies only where prima facie offence of caste-based humiliation in public view established; absent specific allegations against family members, b....
Successive anticipatory bail applications should demonstrate substantial changes in circumstances; principle of parity does not justify granting bail if relevant roles differ and prior application wa....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
