Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ASHOK S.KINAGI
Mahaboob Bi, D/O Late Ismail Sab – Appellant
Versus
N C Sundar Kumar, S/O Late T.Chandraiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHOK S.KINAGI, J.
1. This appeal is filed by the appellants challenging the judgment and decree dated 06.03.2012 passed in R.A. No.65 of 2009 by the learned Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Chickballapur, sitting at Gowribidanur and the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2009 passed in O.S. No.479 of 1994 by the learned Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gowribidanur.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court. The appellant was the plaintiff and the respondent was the defendant.
3. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of this appeal are as follows:
4. The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. It is the case of the plaintiff that the suit schedule property is the self-acquired property of the plaintiff’s mother-Smt.Khyrunbi and she was in possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Plaintiff's mother executed a Hiba (gift) in favour of the plaintiff on 06.11.1986 and the plaintiff accepted the gift and the mother of the plaintiff delivered the possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiff. The plaintiff became the absolute owner and in possession of the suit schedule
Unregistered gift deeds under Mohammedan law do not require registration to be valid, affirming that both oral and written gifts are effective without registration.
The court established that an oral gift requires clear proof of declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession to be valid, which was not met in this case.
The absence of essential elements for a valid gift deed under Mohammedan law led to the dismissal of the suit due to limitations.
A gift under Sec. 123 of the Transfer of Property Act requires acceptance by the donee and the original gift deed must be produced to establish its validity; failure to do so undermines the claim of ....
Ownership of immovable property cannot be established through an unregistered sale deed, which is inadmissible in evidence under the Indian Registration Act, affirming that possession follows title.
A plaintiff must independently prove ownership in a title declaration suit; reliance on the defendant's weaknesses is insufficient.
A gift under Mohammedan law requires explicit acceptance and possession; failure to prove these elements results in denial of ownership claims.
The validity of a registered gift deed does not require consideration, as long as possession is delivered, confirming property rights to the donee.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the defendants were estopped from claiming the sale deed was void due to their failure to challenge it for over 30 years, and their failure to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
