2025 KHC 43463
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
D.K.SINGH, TARA VITASTA GANJU, JJ.
Bangalore Development Authority - Appellant
Vs.
M/s C P S Enterprises - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 2450 of 2014 (LA-BDA)
Decided On : 30-10-2025
Advocate Appeared :
For the Appellant : Sri Murugesh V. Charati, Advocate
For the Respondent : Sri Ashok Haranahalli, Senior Counsel A/W Sri T.P. Vivekananda, Advocate, Sri Mohammad Jaffer Shah, AGA
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to judgment and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of land acquisition notifications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioners' claim from public auction and objections. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments regarding legal expectations and government actions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's reasoning on land ownership and acquisition validity. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. final order allowing the writ appeal. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra-Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.16418-16419/2010 and other connected writ petitions. The said judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge was subject matter of challenge in several writ appeals and a Division Bench of this Court, vide judgment and order dated 22.02.2024 passed in Writ Appeal No.1783/2014 and other connected writ appeals, set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge. The final directions issued by the Division Bench in paragraph 69 are extracted hereunder:
"i) The above appeals filed by the BDA are allowed;
ii) The order dated 11.7.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No.32186/2010 and other connected writ petitions is set aside. The orders passed in writ petitions which are decided placing reliance on the order dated 11.7.2014 passed in WP No.32186/2010 and other connected writ petitions are also set aside;
iii) The preliminary notification bearing No.BDA/ COMMR/DC(LA)/ALAO/158/2008-2009, Bangalore, dated 21.5.2008 and the final notification bearing No.UDD 51 MNX 2010, Bangalore, dated 18.2.2010 issued for acquisition of lands for the formation of the “Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout” are upheld subject to the following conditions:
a) With regard to the land owners (excluding the site owners):
i) All the land owners/writ petitioners who are seeking for dropping of their lands from acquisition on the ground that their lands are (1) nursery lands; (2) situated within green belt; (3) totally built up; (4) that the buildings are constructed by religious/charitable educational institutions; (5) that similar adjoining lands have been either left out from acquisition or de-notified, are permitted to make an application to the BDA seeking for dropping of their lands from acquisition by producing all such material that they deem fit/necessary in support of their applications within 3 months from today;
(ii) The BDA shall consider each of the said application/s keeping in mind the status of the lands as on the date of the preliminary notification and without taking into consideration any developments / improvements / constructions made subsequent to the preliminary notification;
iii) The BDA shall complete the exercise of considering the applications of the writ petitioners and deciding on the same within an outer limit of six months from today;
iv) The BDA, upon consideration of the applications shall intimate the writ petitioners about its decision;
v) If the BDA is of the opinion that the acquisition will have to be proceeded with, the BDA is at liberty to proceed further in accordance with law;
b) Insofar as the site owners who have not made an application as contemplated in para (iii)(a) hereinabove:
i) They shall register themselves for allotment under the BDA (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984 within three months from today by paying the registration fee. However, payment of initial deposit by them is exempted. The necessary documents along with the said applications are also to be filed to enable the BDA to verify the same;
ii) The BDA shall treat the applicants as being entitled for priority allotment and allot each of them a site measuring 30x40 feet in the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout at the prevailing allotment prices subject to the applicants satisfying the dual requirements of allotment under the Rules that they must be the residents of Bengaluru (for 10 years) and should not
THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER vs GURDIAL SINGH AND OTHERS
STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS VS BRAHMPUTRA METALLICS LIMITED, RANCHI
Public auction does not confer superior rights against lawful land acquisition, emphasizing public interest over individual acquisition claims.
Acquisition of isolated lands is unjustified if neighboring lands are excluded, necessitating adherence to Committee recommendations as per judicial directives.
Failure to demonstrate legal possession invalidates land acquisition; lapse of the acquisition scheme confirmed by statutory mandates.
The court confirmed that land acquisition remains valid despite claims of abandonment if possession was taken and the scheme implemented as per law.
The court held that subsisting interest is essential for maintaining land acquisition challenges, and statutory compliance prevails over claims of lapse unless proven otherwise.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.