SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2978

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
M/S RAKSHA INTERNATIONAL FRUIT CO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to notification for shop allotment. (Para 1)
2. failure of apmc to publish notification properly. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. irregularities in allotment process. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. defense of respondents regarding publication of notification. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. respondents argue compliance with legal requirements. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. validity of new arguments in rejoinder. (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 25)
7. analysis of statutory requirements for notification. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
8. interpretation and application of rules for allotment process. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
9. conclusion - dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 36)

ORDER :

1. Challenging notification bearing no.HaHuMaTha (Vi) KruVuMaSa(Ben)/2036/2024-25 dated 01.03.2025 issued by respondent no.3 at Annexure-B and seeking for direction respondents to issue fresh notification for allotment of shops no.F52, F56 and E32 in Singena Agrahara Sub-Market Yard, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District, in accordance with Rule 3 (2), these writ petitions are filed. In W.P.no.27494/2025, an additional prayer for quashing allotment letters dated 18.06.2025 issued by respondent no.3 in favour o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top