THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
M/S RAKSHA INTERNATIONAL FRUIT CO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to notification for shop allotment. (Para 1) |
| 2. failure of apmc to publish notification properly. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. irregularities in allotment process. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. defense of respondents regarding publication of notification. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. respondents argue compliance with legal requirements. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. validity of new arguments in rejoinder. (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. analysis of statutory requirements for notification. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. interpretation and application of rules for allotment process. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 9. conclusion - dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 36) |
ORDER :
1. Challenging notification bearing no.HaHuMaTha (Vi) KruVuMaSa(Ben)/2036/2024-25 dated 01.03.2025 issued by respondent no.3 at Annexure-B and seeking for direction respondents to issue fresh notification for allotment of shops no.F52, F56 and E32 in Singena Agrahara Sub-Market Yard, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District, in accordance with Rule 3 (2), these writ petitions are filed. In W.P.no.27494/2025, an additional prayer for quashing allotment letters dated 18.06.2025 issued by respondent no.3 in favour o
Sri Venkatesh v. Sri P. Subbaiah & Anr.
Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
The court reaffirmed that compliance with publicity requirements under the allocation rules was sufficient, despite claims of irregularities, leading to the dismissal of the petitions challenging the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the allotment of government land must adhere to the principles of equality and eligibility criteria, and the failure to meet the eligibility r....
The discretionary allotments made by the CMDA Chairman were invalid; any property transactions based on such allotments are unenforceable, subject to the outcomes of ongoing litigation.
The court emphasized the legal principles related to the disposal of public properties, legitimate expectations, and the authority's discretion in allotment decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.