Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
M.Baskar – Appellant
Versus
Special Secretary, CMDA, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allotments were made under discretionary quota. (Para 2 , 4 , 12 , 15) |
| 2. court found allotments contrary to law. (Para 6 , 41 , 53) |
| 3. arguments presented regarding notice and legality of transactions. (Para 32 , 34 , 39) |
| 4. doctrine of lis pendens applies to invalid allotments. (Para 46 , 56 , 63) |
| 5. writ petitions dismissed; time granted for vacating property. (Para 74) |
ORDER :
These three writ petitions present a similar issue. Hence, they are clubbed together and disposed of through a common judgment.
3.The Chairman, CMDA had been conferred with the power to allot Plots/Houses/Flats/Shops etc., in all categories in all projects in M.M.Nagar, Manali New Town, KWMC, MBTT, I&SM, CMBT etc., pursuant to a resolution dated 22.10.2008. The Member Secretary, CMDA had issued a proceeding in Proc.No.K5/5455/09 on 15.07.2009 reserving 15% for the Chairman / Minister’s discretionary quota, leaving 85% to be sold through drawal of lots by CMDA till the disposal of the entire stock.
5.The prayer in W.P.No.27345 of 2009 was for issuance of certiorarified mandamus to quash the proceedings dated 15.07.2009 and the consequential allocation proceedings. Similarly, in W.P.No.29197 of 2
The discretionary allotments made by the CMDA Chairman were invalid; any property transactions based on such allotments are unenforceable, subject to the outcomes of ongoing litigation.
Subsequent allottees of fair price shops must be heard in appellate proceedings; failure to do so violates their rights and is contrary to established legal principles.
Writ petitions can be maintained against administrative actions affecting contracts, especially when principles of natural justice and public policy are at stake.
The court emphasized the legal principles related to the disposal of public properties, legitimate expectations, and the authority's discretion in allotment decisions.
The court established that a Gram Panchayat cannot lease property constructed by another authority without following due process, including mandatory public auction.
The court affirmed that public auction is mandatory for property transfers by Panchayats, regardless of lease duration, and unauthorized allotments cannot create rights for allottees.
The court upheld the cancellation of a stall allotment due to unpaid rent, ruling it was not heritable and emphasized the need for transparency in allotment processes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
