SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 3000

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
SRI ASHRAF A. R. BUHARI – Appellant
Versus
SMT RAJAMMA – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Heard Sri Amit Mandgi, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri G.K.Shivaprakash, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. This revision petition is filed by the defendant No.2 challenging the validity of the order passed by the learned Trial Judge in O.S No.594/2012 on the file of XI Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru City (CCH-8) whereby I.A. No.3 filed by the second defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure came to be dismissed by Order dated 30.04.2014.

3. Facts in the nutshell for disposal of the present revision petition are as under:

Respondent Nos.2 and 3 viz. C.N.Geetha and C.N. Shashishekar, being the daughter and son of Smt. Rajamma/ respondent No.1 together filed the aforementioned suit for specific enforcement of an agreement to sell dated 20.12.1973 in respect of the following property hereinafter referred to as ‘suit property’.

“All that piece and parcel of property bearing Municipal No.1 and 2, Hosakere Road and part of Sy.No.10/1, situated at Bhogenahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore, out of which a portion including septic tank, measuring East to West 165+260/2 ft. and North to South: 108+205/2 ft. and total me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top