SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 3002

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
SMT JAYANTHI S SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners seek to set aside multiple orders. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 12 , 13)
2. arguments contesting the validity of mortgages and agency. (Para 16 , 17 , 22 , 23)
3. judgment against the legality of mortgages executed by the power of attorney. (Para 27 , 29 , 31)
4. court's approval of auction sales and legal authority of banks. (Para 36 , 38 , 39)
5. writ petitions are dismissed as an abuse of court process. (Para 40)

ORDER :

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.

1. The Petitioners in W.P.No.27349/2024 are before this court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. Issue a writ of certiorari, thereby setting aside the order dated 02nd September, 2021 passed by the Hon’ble Minister for Co-operation in Revision Petition/Appeal No. CO:31:CAP:2014, as per Annexure-X to this writ petition;

b. Issue a writ of certiorari, thereby setting aside the order dated 03rd January, 2013 passed by R3 in Appeal No.05/2012-13, as per Annexure-W to this Writ Petition;

c. Issue a writ of certiorari, thereby setting aside the awards dated 03rd January, 2004, passed in Dispute Numbers 1049/2003-04 and 1050/2003-04, passed by R2 as per Annexure-E and F respectively, to this writ petition.

d. Issue a writ of certiorari,





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top