SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Bom) 113

PATWARDHAN, J.M.SHELAT
Indulal K. Yagnik – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT - (1) This application under Art. 228 of the Constitution raises the question as to the validity of section 3 of the Police (Incitement to Disaffectio n) Act beig Act No. XXII of 1922.

(2) The petitioner is a memeber of the Loksabha having been elected from the constituency of the City of Ahmedabad and is also the President of the Maha Gujerat Janta Prishad. On the 15th of March 1959, he delivered a speech in a public meeting held under the auspices of the Maha Gujerat Janata Parishad at Gandh Chowk, Saraspur, Ahmedabad, in which he addressed certain remarks amongst other persons to the members of the police force. It is alleged that the speech was in contravention of Section 3 of the said Act.

(3) The speech made by the petitioner and taken down by the police shorthand-writer runs as follows:

"Someone (policemen) tells me to form an Union. I told him to form Seva Mandal. There is fund of the department (Police Welfare Fund). The children of policemen should be given education and the ailing persons should be known (sic) everywhere; that there is dissatisfasction among the policemen and when the 8t August will come they will realise that they were so far acting like enemies o









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top