SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 67

B.P.SARAF, D.K.TRIVEDI
Technova Graphic Systems Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Sales Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Dr. SARAF B.P., J.:---By this reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax, 1959, the Mahararshtra Sales Tax Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this Court for opinion at the instance of the assessee:

"Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that lacquering of polyester film amounts to manufacture within the meaning of section 2(17) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and it results into a different commercial commodity?"

2. The assessee M/s. Technova Graphic Systems carries on the business of buying polyester films and selling the same after subjecting it to the process of lacquering. On 26th November, 1987, the assessee made an application under section 52(1)(b) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 ("the Act") to the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Admn.) seeking determination of the question whether subjecting the polyester film to the chemical process of lacquering amounts to manufacture within the meaning of section 2(17) of the Act. The contention of the assessee before the Deputy Commissioner was that the process of lacquering did not amount to manufacture. The Deputy Commissioner (Admn.) however did not accept this contention of the a





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top