SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 357

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(AURANGABAD BENCH)
Kapadia S.H. Marlapalle B.H., JJ.
Rajesh Yadavrao Shankpale.... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra others.... Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 912 of 1988, decided on 5-5-1999.
Advocate appeared :
S.B. Talekar, for petitioner.
K.B. Chaudhari, A.G.P. Suresh Kulkarni, for respondents.

Headnote:Articles 226 and 342-Caste Certificate-Admission to professional course-Father of petitioner being DBC with caste "Koli" in his service records-Presidential order removing area restriction in respect of "Mahadev Koli" at time of admission of his son petitioner-School record of son also got corrected accordingly showing him as "Mahadev Koli" Validity-Held, claim of son as belonging to caste "Mahadev Koli" on basis of service record of his father was rightly rejected.- The extract clearly shows that Madhav, brother of the petitioner, stood admitted in the same school on 4th July, 1970 when he was described as Koli and the petitioner herein was shown under the altered entry as Mahadeo Koli. It is for this reason that the Head Master has signed only against the altered entry in the case of the petitioner and not in the case of Madhav and Tara. One fails to understand as to why be Head Master corrected the entry pertaining to the petitioner only and not to Madhav. Taking into account the above facts, it is clear that the record has been charged after 1983 in order to obtain concessions from the policy of the Government. In the circumstances, we do not find merit in the contentions advanced on behalf of the petitioner that there was a genuine entry made in favour of the petitioner before 1978. The petitioner has not produced the school record. The petitioner has not produced the school record. R-3 has been produced by the respondents. However, even R-3 shows that the entry has been altered after 1978, R-3 has been signed on 11th March, 1988. Hence, we are satisfied that the Scrutiny Committee was right in coming to the conclusion that the entire basis of the petitioners claim is founded on the charge effected in the service roll of the father during 1982-83 and that even the brothers of the petitioner have received the benefits of that charge after the 8th January, 1983 when the father obtained the certificate from the Taluka Executive Magistrate declaring him to be Mahadeo Koli. The contention of the learned Advocate that as a consequence of the Presidential order of 1978, the Kolis in Marathwada region became Mahadeo Kolis, is far fetched and cannot be accepted as the main intention behind the Presidential order of 1978 was to remove the area restrictions and not to correct the caste structure from OBC to Scheduled Tribe. In any event, even if the argument of the petitioner is accepted, still on facts, the petitioners record shows that in the school record change has been effected only after 1978. That the entry standing against the name of the petitioner has been altered by the Head Master in 1988. Hence, on facts, we do not find any merit in the contentions advanced on behalf of the petitioner.

JUDGMENT - KAPADIA S.H., J.:---By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the Scrutiny Committee dated 28th March, 1988 by which the Scrutiny Committee came to the conclusion that the petitioner does not belong to Mahadeo Koli, scheduled tribe and, accordingly, his claim came to be invalidated. The decision of the Scrutiny Committee has since been upheld by the Appellate Authority also vide judgment dated 30-3-1983 in Caste Appeal Case No. 130/1988.

2. The facts giving rise to this writ petition, briefly, are as follows :---

3. On 5th July, 1982 a caste certificate came to be issued by Taluka Executive Magistrate in favour of Madhav Yadavrao Shankapale (brother of the petitioner herein). According to that certificate, Madhav was declared to be belonging to Mahadeo Koli caste which falls under scheduled tribes. That certificate came to be referred for verification to the Director of Social Welfare, Pune. Pending verification, Yadavrao, father of the petitioner applied to the Taluka Executive Magistrate and obtained a certificate on 8th January, 1983 to the effect that he belongs to the caste- Mahadeo Koli. This was in view of the fact that Yadavrao, father of the petitioner, who had joined the Government service as an employee wanted to change the service record in which his name was enrolled on 1st September, 1966. On the date of enrolment, Yadavrao was shown in the service roll as belonging to Koli caste which falls under O.B.C. On the basis of the said certificate dated 8th January, 1983 Yadavrao got the entry in the service roll altered from O.B.C. to scheduled tribe sometimes in July 1983. On 14th October, 1982 Director of Social Welfare invalidated the caste certificate issued by the Taluka Executive Magistrate in favour of the brother of the petitioner herein. Against the said decision of the Director of Social Welfare, Madhav preferred an appeal to the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad. In the said appeal Madhav, brother of the petitioner, relied upon the abovementioned service record of his father Yadavrao and on that basis the Appellate Authority overruled the decision of Director of Social Welfare and validated the claim of Madhav.

4. Now coming to the facts of the present case it may be mentioned that the Taluka Executive Magistrate, Biloli, Dist. Nanded, issued a caste certificate in favour of the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner belongs to Koli Mahadeo caste, which is recognized as a scheduled tribe at Sr. No. 29 under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1970. The petitioner appeared in the 12th Std. Examination held in March-April 1988 and prior to that, he passed his S.S.C. Examination sometimes in the month of March-April 1986. The Head Master of the school where the petitioner studied upto S.S.C. also issued a certificate stating that the petitioner belongs to Mahadeo Koli caste. For seeking admission to the professional courses, the petitioner approached the Scrutiny Committee for verification of his tribe claim. He submitted as many as 15 documents before the Scrutiny Committee in support of his claim and also the affidavits of Shankar Gangaram Amberao, Laxmi Sambhaji Khanderay and Arjun Sambhaji Khanderay. Amongst the 15 documents submitted were the copies of caste certificate of his elder brothers Mohan, Madhav, Shankar and younger brother Mangesh and sisters Miss Vijaya and Miss Nanda as well as the extract of the first page of his father's service book, a copy of caste certificate dated 8-1-1983 issued by the Taluka Executive Magistrate in favour of his father, a copy of the order issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, in favour of Shri Madhav Yadavrao elder brother of the candidate, a copy of judgment of this Court in W.P. No. 753/84 regarding the caste claim of Shankar Gangaram Amberao and the School Leaving Certificate issued in his favour by the Zilla Parishad High School, Biloli. It is re












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top