N.J.PANDYA, A.B.PALKAR
Maroti Sakharam Wasekar – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar, Mul & another – Respondent
2. The elections to Gram Panchayat Sintala, Taluqa Mul, District Chandrapur, were to be held as per the election programme announced some-where in the early part of December 1998. The nominations were to be filed on 7-12-1998 followed by its scrutiny and thereafter holding of the election. The elections are to be held on 26-12-1998. Following the scrutiny in both the matters the nomination papers of respective petitioner were rejected on 12-12-1998.
3. So far as the reason for rejection is concerned, the Returning Officer held that the municipal dues relating to water bill charges have not been paid.
4. In both the petitions, it is a common ground of the respective petitioners that the aforesaid finding is baseless because the alleged bills were not served on the petitioners and if served no notice of demand was made. When the matter was circulated before us on 17-12-1998, we issued Notice with a view to enable the respondents to find out whether the petitioners in fact were defaulters in payment of municipal dues and so far as important aspect of notice is concerned, is there no acknowledgment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.