SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 383

G.D.PATIL, S.K.SHAH
Narendra s/o Sakharam Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - G.D. PATIL, J.:---All these petitions were heard at the stage of motion hearing and making rule returnable forthwith with consent of learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing for the State and its authorities so also the other learned Counsel appearing for other some of the respondents though some of them were only nominal parties and, therefore, no service was found to be necessary on some of them. Further since the common question involved in all these petitions is the effect of the de-recognition of the Two Year Diploma in teaching Course (Dip. T) of the erstwhile Sagar University and now as Dr. Harisingh Gaur Vishwa Vidyalaya, Sagar and Devi Ahilya Vishwa Vidyalaya, Indore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2.In Writ Petition Nos. 2771/97, 2772/97, 2773/97, 2774/97 and 2775/97 each of the petitioners therein have obtained Dip. T. Two Years Course of Dr. Harisingh Gaur Vishwa Vidyalaya, Sagar. Each of them joined and completed the said course respectively on (1) 17-7-1992 and 30-4-1994, (2) 1-8-1991 and 30-4-1993 (3) 19-7-1992 and 30-4-1994, (4) 13-8-1991 and 30-4-1993 and (5) 1-8-1991 and 30-4





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top