G.D.PATIL, A.M.KHANWILKAR
Vinod Vithal Rane & others – Appellant
Versus
R. H. Mendonca & others – Respondent
2. That each of the detenu in the respective writ petition has been detained on the ground that he is a dangerous person of violent character and a weapon wielding desperado indulging in terrorizing activities. The grounds of detention served on each of the detenu mention that they were indulging in criminal activities and had created a reign of terror in the minds of public in the areas of Geetanagar and areas adjoining thereto within the jurisdiction of Colaba Police Station in Brihan Mumbai, for they were moving armed with deadly weapons such as chopper, knife and sword and did not hesitate to use the same while c
Francis Coralie Mullin v. U.T. Delhi
Prabhu Dayal Deorah v. D.M. Kamrup
B.K. Garad v. Nasik Merchants Co-op. Bank
Mushtaq Shaikh v. State of Guj.
Kundan Bai Shaikh v. D.M. Ahmedabad
Abhay Shridhar Ambulkar v. S.V. Bhave, Commissioner of Police
Raj Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar
Giani Bakshish Singh v. G.O.I.
Pandharinath Rangnekar v. The State of Maharashtra
Borjahan Gorey v. The State of West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.