SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 174

SUHAS C. SEN, K. S. PARIPOORNAN, A. M. AHMADI
Nitasha Paul – Appellant
Versus
Maharishi Dayan And University, Rohtak – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sen, J.-Special leave granted.

2. The appeal arises out of a writ petition filed by Nitasha Paul. Her case is that she obtained admission in K.L.E.S. Dental College and Hospital, Belgaum (Karnataka). After passing the first year professional BDS examination, she applied for migration to the Government Dental College, Rohtak for the second year course. The case of Nitasha is that the Dental College at Belgaum was a recognised institution and she was admitted on the basis of her performance in the earlier examinations. Along with her application for migration. She attached a No Objection Certificate from the Belgaum College wherein it was certified that she was a bona fide student of the college studying in the second year BDS course for the year 1993-94. Nitasha s application was received by the office of the Dental College, Rohtak on 4th August, 1993 and was marked S. No. 4293.

3. The Maharishi Dayanand University (for short M.D. University ) had received 49 applications in all, seeking migration from different colleges throughout the country. A sub-committee was set up to process the applications.

4. The sub-committee was headed by the Dean of Dental College, Rohtak. Out of




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top