SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 668

A.P.SHAH, S.A.BOBDE
Crompton Greaves Ltd. & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.P. SHAH, J.:---The constitutional validity of section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 has been challenged in these writ petitions. This question which is common to all the writ petitions is the only question which arises for consideration and these writ petitions are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, which is hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as the Act, lays down :

"Section 3(1). This Act shall not apply

(a) .......

(b) to any premises let or sub-let to banks, or any Public Sector Undertakings or any Corporation established by or under any Central or State Act, or foreign missions, international agencies, multinational companies, and private limited companies and public limited companies having a paid up share capital of rupees one crore or more.

Explanation.---For the purpose of this Clause the expression "bank" means:-

(i) the State Bank of India constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955:

(ii) a subsidiary bank as defined in the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 :

(iii) a corresponding new bank constituted under section 3 of the Banking




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top