A.M.KHANWILKAR
Shankar Savala Gurav – Appellant
Versus
Bala Govinda Patil – Respondent
2. The sole question that arises for consideration in the present case is whether the tenant could have instituted an application under section 84 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 for restoration of his possession or was obliged to file application under section 29 of the Act for such a relief.
3. Briefly stated, the land in question is R.S. No. 512/3 at Village Shiroli, Taluka Hatkanangale admeasuring 27 gunthas only. The predecessor of respondent-Mr. Bala Govinda Patil was lawfully cultivating the suit land as a tenant on the tillers day i.e. 1-4-1957. However, according to the petitioner-landlord, possession of the suit land was obtained from the tenant sometime in 1965 as the tenant surrendered the suit land. The tenant, however, disputed the factum that it was voluntarily surrendered. However, according to them, it was a forcible dispossession. The tenant, on the other hand, filed an application purported to be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.