S.RADHAKRISHNAN, C.K.THAKKER
Bombay Environmental Action Group & another – Appellant
Versus
A. R. Bharati, Deputy Conservator of Forest & others – Respondent
Per THAKKER C.K., C.J.:---In all these petitions, common questions of fact and law have been involved. It is, therefore, appropriate to deal with and decide all the petitions by a common judgment.
2. To appreciate the controversy raised in various petitions, few facts in the first matter, i.e. Writ Petition No. 305 of 1995, may now be stated.
3. The said petition is filed by Bombay Environmental Action Group, for an appropriate writ, direction or order directing authorities of the State Government as well as the Central Government to remove forthwith respondent Nos. 7 and 8 and other encroachers from the National Park and re-locate them in non-forest areas by demolishing all unauthorised and illegal structures from National Park. A prayer is also sought directing the respondents to take all necessary and precautionary steps, including construction of a boundary wall to prevent further encroachment and unauthorised structure in the said park. It is prayed that respondents be permanently restrained from providing encroachers any amenities and regularising in any manner encroachment and unauthorised structures in National Park. Legality and validity of the order dated 12th Febru
T.N. Godavarman Thirumalkpad v. Union of India
Pradeep Krishen v. Union of India
Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal
Dwarkadas Marfatia and Sons v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Prabodh Verma v. State of U.P.
Gopi Aqua Farms v. Union of India
Premji Ratansey Shah v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.