SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1516

RANJANA DESAI
Sanwarmal Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
Hari Kumar Sharma @ H. K. Sharma – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) THE petitioner is original defendant in R. A. E. Suit No. 755/2609 of 1983. The respondent is the original plaintiff in that suit. For the sake of convenience it would be better to refer to the parties as per their status in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the instant suit for recovery of possession of the premises i. e. Flat No. 25 situated on 4th floor of Vishwa mahal, Plot No. 51, Churchgate Reclamation, bombay - 400 020 ("the suit premises" for short) on the ground that the plaintiff requires the suit premises reasonably and bonafide for his residential purpose and for his family members. The suit was filed under Section 13 (l) (g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and lodging Housing Rates (Control) Act, 1947 ("rent Act" for short ).

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs case will have to be shortly stated. The plaintiff was working as re-settlement officer before his retirement in Rajasthan. He retired in March, 1983. The defendant is the monthly tenant of the suit premises on monthly rent of Rs. 450/ -. According to the plaintiff he gave notice dated 3rd May, 1979 demanding the possession of the suit premises from the defendant. The plaintiff terminated the tenancy of the defendan




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top