SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1424

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
JYOTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) IN this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of constitution of India, petitioner who happens to be President of the Zilla parishad, Washim has challenged the show cause notice dated 30-3-2005 served upon her by Commissioner, Amravati Region, Amravati, respondent No. 3 herein, under section 16 (l) (i) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat samiti Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "1961 Act" ). On the 19-4-2005 after hearing Advocate Khapre for petitioner I have issued notice before admission and directed the petitioner to file her reply to the said show cause notice before respondent No. 3. After hearing learned AGP on 3-5-2005 said respondent No. 3 was permitted to proceed further with inquiry but was restrained from passing final orders to the prejudice of petitioner. Writ petition stands at same stage for last about four months. Advocate Priyadarshan Madkholkar has moved one application vide Civil Application No. 3463/2005 on behalf of a Sarpanch of gram Panchayat and a citizen of said gram panchayat for vacation of interim orders stating that they have moved respondent No. 3 for declaration of disqualification under above-mentioned provisions and show











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top