SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 992

S.R.DONGAONKAR, R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
ASHOK s/o PANDURANG JANJAL – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, TULSABAI KAWAL VIDYALAYA, PATUR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. : - In this appeal notice was issued for final disposal of the matter at the admission stage and accordingly the matter was heard and is being disposed of finally at the admission stage itself. We have heard at length the Advocates for the appellant and the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The respondent No.3 is a formal party.

2. The appeal arises from the order dated 16 - 9 - 2005 passed in Writ Petition No. 3368 of 1993. By the impugned order, the learned single Judge has set aside the Judgment of the School Tribunal dated 1 - 10 - 1993 in Appeal No. 38 of 1989. The School Tribunal had set aside the order of the Management dated 6 - 4 - 1988 terminating the services of the appellant/petitioner and the petitioner was directed to be reinstated in the post of peon as a probationer within 40 days. During the pendency of the Writ Petition, the said order was stayed.

3. The order of termination of services of the petitioner was set aside by the Tribunal on the ground of failure on the part of the Management to comply with the requirements of Rule 15 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981, hereinafte




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top