V.R.KINGAONKAR
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
NIRANJAN ALLOYS STEELS PVT. LTD. , AURANGABAD – Respondent
2. This petition involves question whether inherent powers available under section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code could be invoked by the trial Court for allowing extension of time to deposit deficit Court fees and restoration of suit when the plaint was rejected under Order VIT, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code due to non-payment of the required Court fees.
3. A resume of few facts may be set out in order to gather the dimensions of the disputed questions. A Special Civil Suit was filed by the respondent for recovery of damages and compensation to the tune of Rs. 853.50 lacs against the petitioner-M.S.E.B. There was deficit Court fees when the plaint was filed. An application was filed for grant of one month's time to deposit the remaining Court fees. After lapse of one month, again extension of time was sought which was rejected by the trial Court. The respondent filed yet another application dated 9-8-2002 seeking one week's time by way of last chance to make up the deficit Court fees or alternatively to allow him to deposit a cheque of Rs. 3,00,000/-. The alternative prayer was gra
Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Machado Brothers and others
M/s Ram Chand and Sons Sugar Mills Private Ltd., Barabanki (U.P.) vs. Kanhayalal Bhargava and others
Shamsher Singh vs. Rajinder Prashad and others
G. Christhudas and another vs. Anbiah (Dead) and others
Manohar Lal Chopra vs. Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal
Abdul Rahim B. Attar and others vs. Atul Ambalal Barot and another
Vishwanath Satwaji Gaikwad vs. Laxman Abaji Kawale and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.