SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 2093

V.C.DAGA, A.B.CHAUDHARI
SHAILENDRA PRAKASHCHANDRA DARDA – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

V.C. DAGA, J. :- This petition was heard by us on 22-12-2006 and the same was dismissed for the reasons to be recorded. Accordingly, the facts and reasons are being recorded.

2. This petition is burning example exhibiting gross impropriety in selecting and appointing the petitioner as Laboratory Attendant in the respondent No.5 School, known as Abhyankar Girls' School and Junior College, Yeotmal run by the respondent No.4 Womens' Education Society, Yeotmal. The School Committee of the respondent No. 5 School headed by its President Mr. Amarchand Pannalal Darda has selected and appointed his nephew i.e. real brother's son, the present petitioner, Mr. Shailendra Darda to the post of Laboratory Attendant. The approval to the said appointment was refused by respondents No.2 and 3 - The Director and The Deputy Director of Education., Hence, this petition.

3. Factual matrix reveals that the post of Laboratory Attendant was lying vacant in respondent No.5-school almost for a period of more than one year prior to the date of appointment. Respondent No.4-society issued an advertisement for making appointment to the post of Laboratory Attendant with the prior approval of respon









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top