SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 1304

A.P.LAVANDE, A.H.JOSHI
FULCHAND BABURAO GEDAM – Appellant
Versus
LOKMAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.MARPAKWAR, S.D.THAKUR

A. H. JOSHI, J, J.

( 1 ) THESE letters patent appeals arising out of common judgment and raising common question of law, are being disposed of by this judgment.

( 2 ) THE appeals proceed on certain admitted premises, which are narrated as follows:-

(a) The appellants claim to be employed by respondent. (b) Appellants filed separate complaints before the Industrial court, Maharashtra Bench at Nagpur, under Sections 5, 28, 30 r/w section 26 and 27 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union, and prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), with similar prayers in all complaints which are as follows:-"i) declare that the Respondent has engaged in and is still engaging in the unfair labour practices complained of; ii) direct the Respondent to cease and desist from engaging in the unfair labour practices complained of; iii) direct the respondent to withdraw temporarily during the pendency of these proceedings and also finally the impugned unfair labour practices forthwith and to grant to the complainant the status and all other privileges and benefits that are applicable to regular and permanent Peons with retrospective effect and in any case from th































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top