JUDGMENT

B.L.HANSARIA, J.

(1) TWO questions in the main need our determination in this batch of appeals which are by the Chief Conservator of Forests, State of Maharashtra. The first and foremost question is whether Forest Department of the State government is an industry within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter "the central Act"), which definition has been adopted by the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for short "the State Act"). We shall have then to address ourselves to the question whether in the cases at hand the employer, namely the State government, had indulged in unfair labour practice visualised by Item 6 of Schedule IV of the State Act, as alleged by the respondents before the Industrial court, Pune/Ahmednagar. If these questions would be answered in the affirmative, we would be required to consider whether the directions given by the aforesaid Industrial court need our interference,

(2) BEFORE applying our mind to the first question, it would be apposite to mention that this point had not been before the Industrial court and it is becaus