ANOOP V.MOHTA, V.G.PALSHIKAR
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
SAHEBRAO @ NAVNATH SOPAN Kale – Respondent
( 1 ) THE present confirmation case has been referred by the additional sessions Judge, Pune, in pursuance to the provision of Section 366 of Cr. P. C. , as appellant -accused No. 3 in criminal appeal No. 999/2004 has been convicted under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of Indian penal Code and sentenced to death.
( 2 ) THE appellant accused No. 3 has also preferred the appeal against the order of conviction and sentence, whereby, he was convicted under Section 449, 460, 392, 201, 302 r/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, along with appellant-accused No. 2 in Criminal Appeal No: 889/2004. The learned Judge has sentenced to (undergo) imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code to the appellant -accused No. 2. However, for the same offence the appellant No. 3 has been sentenced to death. Original accused no. 1 Bhagwat could not be tried as he is absconding. The operative part of the impugned judgment and order dated 20th january, 2004 in Sessions case No. 368/ 1997, in question is reproduced as under :" (1) Accused No. 2, Geetabai w/o bhagwat Kale and accused No. 3. Sahebrao alias Navnath son of Sopan Kale are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.