SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 1317

2009 ALL MR (Cri) 3294
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.
Kisanlal s/o. DagdulaI Rathi – Appellant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition Nos.922, 332, 65, 87, 328, 113 of 2009 WITH Criminal Applicatipn Nos.I269, 683, 682 of 2009
Decided on : 5th October, 2009.

Advocates appeared:
Mr. V. D. HON, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mrs. A. V. GONDHALEKAR, APP for Respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. P. P. CHA V AN, Advocate, for Respondent No.5.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Section 482-Quashing of F.I.R.-Mere existence of civil remedy is not a ground for quashing the F.I.R.-Civil dispute cannot be allowed to be converted into criminal action-However, if on same set of facts, civil wrong as well as criminal wrong is shown to have been committed, then the mere existence of civil remedy is not a ground for quashing the FIR. (Paras 10 and 14)

       

JUDGMENT :- This group of petitions is being decided together in as much as the petitioners seek quashing of First Information Reports (FIRs), registered against them at Chalisgaon Police Station, for offences punishable under sections 406, 408, 409, 420, 465,468,471,120 read with section 34 of the I.P. Code.

2. "The Chalisgaon Peoples Cooperative Bank Limited" (for short, "CPCO Bank") is a Co-operative Bank. A large number of depositors invested their amounts by way of deposits in the CPCO Bank. The CPCO Bank was under management of a Board of Directors. Indisputably, an Liquidator is now appointed and is managing the affairs of the CPCO Bank. It is undisputed that a Special Auditor carried out audit of the CPCO Bank for the period between 1991-92 to 2005-06. He prepared audit inspection notes. He noticed a large number of misdeeds committed by the Directors and borrowers of the CPCO Bank during the period under the audit inspection. He noticed that some of the Directors and the borrowers were hand-in-glove. They had duped the Bank in connivance with each other.

Huge loans were disbursed to the kiths and kins, friends and close associates of the Directors without obtaining proper securities and without following regular norms.

Resultantly, the recoveries of such loans became highly improbable. The depositors of the CPCO Bank were defrauded due to such malpractices adopted by the Directors and some of the borrowers. The CPCO Bank has been put to great financial loss. Thus, the hard earned money of the depositors became unsafe and they were unable to get back the deposited amounts. The borrowers had no intention to repay nor the amounts were lent after taking proper precaution. The Directors and the borrowers conspired to misappropriate the amounts of the CPCO Bank. They doctored various documents in order to prepare record regarding disbursement of the loans, though such amounts were embezzled and misappropriated in connivance with each other by the borrowers and some of the Directors. It The borrowers were found in arrears of the s amounts to the extent of Rs.3,93,02,538/- as ), on 31st March, 2006. The Special Auditor was e directed to lodge a report. He, therefore, filed First Information Reports at Chalisgaon Police Station, which were registered vide Crime Nos.250/2008, 252/2008; 256/2008 and 259/2008, against as many as twenty (20) Exy Directors, one (1) Ex-Chairman, five (5) ) borrowers and one (1) Ex-Manager of the If CPCO Bank.

3. Briefly stated, case of petitioner Kishanlal in Criminal Writ Petition No.922/ 2008 is that he availed loan facility of the CPCO Bank in the year 1998. He repaid the loan amount from time to time in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bank. He was again and again given loan facility since ha had cleared the earlier debt. He executed necessary documents from time to time by way of security for repayment of the, loan. The CPCO Bank initiated proceedings against him under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short, "the MCS Act") for recovery of the loan amount. The learned Assistant Registrar (Co-operative Societies) rejected the application for issuance of such certificate and, therefore, the CPCO it Bank had preferred revision application No.65/2008 under section 154 of the MCS Act. The

revisional authority remanded the proceedings to the Assistant Registrar with direction to conduct de novo inquiry. The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies again refused to issue the certificate and the said order is no sub judice before the Divisional Joint Registrar in Revision Application No. 19/2008. The FIR is lodged with ulterior motive to coax him to shell out the disputed amount as desired the CPCO Bank. He has filed Dispute No.1163/2008 in the Co-operative Court Jalgaon for declaration that the amount claimed by the CPCO Bank is incorrect and improper and the CPCO Bank cannot charge compound interest. The Co-operative Court has directed the Special Aud


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top