R.S.DALVI, SWATANTER KUMAR, A.M.KHANWILKAR
Panchabhai Popotbhai Butani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Swatanter Kumar, C.J.
Preamble of our Constitution guarantees to a citizen justice, liberty, equality and fraternity. All these are possible only when there is rule of law. The rule of law could discernibly be dissected into two well accepted concepts : (i) governance and (ii) administration of justice. They are not only the pillars of the Constitutional mandate, but are linchpin to the growth, development and independence of any nation or society. Governance obviously means good governance and it refers to the task of running the Government in an effective manner. Right to a legitimate and accountable government under which fundamental rights and human rights are respected and the Government controlled by the rule of law are the basic elements of good governance. Rule of law indicates good governance which requires fair legal framework that enforce law impartially. Impartial enforcement of laws requires an independent judiciary and an impartial and incorruptible police force.
2. Edward W Younkins in “The Purpose of Law and Constitutions” has noted, “The rule of law requires that people should be governed by accepted rules, rather than by the arbitrary decisions of rule
Sandeep Rammilan Shukla v State of Maharashtra 2009 (1) Mh.LJ 97
Dharmeshbhai Vasudevbhai and others vs. State of Gujarat and others (2009) 6 SCC 576.
Sakiri Vasu vs. Statement of Uttar Pradesh and others (2008) 2 SCC 409.
Divine Retreat Centre vs. State of Kerala and others (2008) 3 SCC 542.
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2008)7 SCC 164
Prakash Singh Badal and Anr. v State of Punjab and Ors. (2007) 1 SCC 1
Popular Muthiah v State represented by Inspector of Police (2006) 7 SCC 296
State of Karnataka and another v Pastor P Raju (2006) 6 SCC 728
Mohd. Yousuf vs. Afaq Jahan (Smt.) and another (2006) 1 SCC 627.
Minu Kumari and Anr. v State of Bihar and Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 359
Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2004 (7) SCC 768
Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors. (1999)3 SCC 259.
Madhu Bala vs. Suresh Kumar and others (1997) 8 SCC 476.
State of W.B. V Mohd. Khalid (1995) 1 SCC 684
Kishun Singh v State of Bihar (1993) 2 SCC 16
Savitri vs. Govind Singh Rawat AIR 1986 SC 984.
A.R. Antulay v Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak and another (1984) 2 SCC 500
State of Bihar and Anr. v. J.A.C. Saldanha and Ors. 1980 (1) SCC 554
State of Punjab and Anr. vs. Gurdial Singh and Ors. 1980 (2) SCC 471
Tula Ram and others vs. Kishore Singh (1977) 4 SCC 459.
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v State of Maharashtra AIR 1971 SC 2372
S.N. Sharma vs. Bipen Kumar Tiwari AIR 1970 SC 786
Abhinandan Jha vs. Dinesh Mishra AIR 1968 SC 117.
Gopal Das Sindhi and others v State of Assam and another AIR 1961 SC 986.
Narayandas Bhagwandas Madhavdas v State of W.B. AIR 1959 SC 1118 = 1960 1 SCR 93
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.