B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
Raymond UCO Denim Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Praful Warade – Respondent
By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/employer has challenged the order dt. 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULPComplaintNo.27 of 2007. By that order, while allowing the ULP Complaint filed by present respondent nos. 1 to 53, the learned Member of Industrial Court has directed the petitioner/employer to grant permanency to the said respondents from the date after completion of three months of their appointment as a probationer and to give them all other monetary benefits and service benefits in accordance with the agreement dt. 18.2.2005, within a period of two months from the date of its order. This Court has, on 10th December, 2009, admitted the mater, granted expeditious hearing and also granted stay of coercive recovery subject to petitioners depositing amount of difference as per the said order of the Industrial Court. Accordingly, the amount of difference has been deposited with the Registry of this Court.
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 manufacturing Denim fabric. It's factory at Yavatmal has come up in 1996. Respondent No
S. Shanmugavel Nadar Vs. State of T. N.
A. G. Varadarajulu Vs. State of T. N.
The Associated Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. P. D. Vyas
Aswini Kumar Ghose Vs. Arabinda Bose
H. H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Vs. Union of India
Banaras Electric Light and Power Co. Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.