SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Bom) 281

GINWALA, PATEL
Khandelwal Traders, Akola – Appellant
Versus
Akola Municipal Council – Respondent


Advocates:
B.A. Udhoji, V.S. Sohoni, for Petitioner; L. Mohta, for Respondent.

Judgement

GINWALA, J. :- The petitioner which is a partnership firm and deals in bailing hoops and other commodities, seeks a writ of mandamus against the respondent Municipal Council (hereinafter referred to as "the Council"), ordering it "to forbear from claiming octroi on goods which are in transit from one octroi limit to another and which are neither consumed nor used within the municipal area" of the respondent and "to refund the tax illegally collected" amounting to Rs. 809.59.

2. The case of the petitioner is that on 25-3-1975, 1-4-1975 and 2-5-1975 it imported within the octroi limits of the Council three consignments of iron bailing hoops consisting of 500, 300 and 550 bundles and were deposited in the bonded warehouse maintained by the Council. It exported 300 bundles out of the first consignment, 100 bundles out of the second and all the bundles of the third consignment on 25-3-1975, 1-4-1975 and 2-5-1975 respectively after carrying out all the formalities and depositing the amount of octroi as required by the relevant Rules of the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 (called the Rules).

3. Similarly on 8-1-1973, 30-1-1973 and 6-2-1973, it had imported three con





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top