2011 (3) ALL MR 286
In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
A.H. JOSHI & A.B. CHAUDHARI
Urdu Education Association & Others
Versus
Deputy Director of Education & Others
WRIT PETITION NO.254 OF 1993, WRIT PETITION NO.1297 OF 1995, WRIT PETITION NO.1888 OF 1993, WRIT PETITION NO.2231 OF 1995, WRIT PETITION NO.2291 OF 1995, WRIT PETITION NO.2292 OF 1995, WRIT PETITION NO.2295 OF 1995, AND WRIT PETITION NO.3572 OF 1995
Decided on : 16-03-2011
Therefore, Court holds that these petitioners in writ petition Nos. 1888/1993 and 3572/1995 are not entitled for any relief and thus petitions are liable to be dismissed. The salaries and allowances drawn by the teachers will however stand appropriated towards duty performed by them.
The Court cannot forget the fact that these appointees have been put to sufferance and hardships. Thus, balancing the entire matter regarding award of full back wages, in considered opinion of the Court, award of back wages to the extent of 25% of the full back wages should sub-serve the interest of justice.
Constitution of India - Article 226-Writ petition-Fraud, allegedly played on Court-Court, allegedly misrepresented by a collusive writ petition-Proof of allegations- Adequate pleadings, cogent evidence and materials on record necessary to draw an inference that found played on Court or Court misled.
A.H. JOSHI, J.
1. These writ petitions are taken up together for hearing and final disposal.
2. This Court by order dated 6.8.1997 in Writ Petition No.1297/1995 directed that Writ Petition No. 254/1993 be heard as lead matter amongst several writ petitions and hence, we have heard Writ Petition No. 254/1993 first and thereafter we have heard all the connected writ petitions one by one.
3. In view that the group of petitions is being heard together, it would be necessary to have a glance at the tenor of different groups out of this group petitions. Those are as follows:
(1) WRIT PETITION NO. 254/1993
This petition is filed by Urdu Education Association, who runs the Educational Institution. In this petition, the said institution is represented through its President Mr. Munaf Hussain Inayat Hussain. The object of the petition is to -
(i) seek a declaration that judgment rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No.1943/1992 is not binding on the petitioner.
(ii) declare that respondent No.3, former receiver of the Trust has no authority to appoint respondent Nos. 4 to 7 therein.
(iii) the order passed by the Education Officer on 3.12.1992, granting approval for appointments of respondent Nos.4 to 7 therein be quashed.
(iv) declaration that respondent Nos.4 to 7 therein are not entitled to any relief such as salary.
(2) WRIT PETITION NO.1297/1995
This petition is filed by Urdu Education Society through President Mr. Munaf Hussain Inayat Hussain challenging the judgment and order passed by the School Tribunal, Amravati in Appeal Nos.189/92-A to 197/92-A decided by common judgment and order dated 9.3.1995, granting reinstatement and back wages to respondent Nos.2 to 10 therein. Respondent Nos.3 to 7 in Writ Petition No.254/1993 are amongst these nine respondents.
The challenge in writ petition No.1297/1995 is based on the ground inter alia that during pendency of first appeal in the High Court between Mr. Munaf Hussain Inayat Hussain and others against the Charity Commissioner, the receiver was not and could not have functioned as administrator of the Trust etc.
(3) WRIT PETITION NO.3572/1995
This petition is filed by four appointees against the Educational Institution claimed to be run by the President Mr. Munaf Hussain Inayat Hussain. These employees had prayed for mandamus for approval to their appointments.
These four employees, whose services were terminated during pendency of the petition by orders dated 9.12.1996, have prayed for setting aside those orders and consequently, benefit of payment of salary etc..
(4) WRIT PETITION NO.1888/1993
This petition is filed by Noor Subah d/o Mohd. Nayeem Qureshi, claiming relief of mandamus against the Education Officer, seeking approval to the appointments which were made by President Mr. Munaf Hussain Inayat Hussain.
4. In support of the lead writ petition, learned Senior Advocate Shri K.H. Deshpande made the following submissions :
(a) The first board of trustees who were appointed in the scheme proceedings made on 25.2.1975 by the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Mumbai in Suo Motu Proceeding No.127/1973, in which Mr. Munaf Hussain Inayat Hussain was the president, took charge on 22.4.1991, after civil court dismissed the suit by judgment and decree dated 20.4.1991, holding that the suit is not maintainable. During pendency of said suit the appointment of these trustees was kept in abeyance, pending decision of suit. Receiver Mr. Wazir Patel, who was appointed by order in suit, stood removed because of dismissal of the suit and the first board of trustee took charge of the Trust and its properties.
(b) That the first board of trustees including the President - Munaf Hussain s/o Inayat Hussain took charge on 22.4.1991 is fully corroborated and supported by the following events:
(i) The suit itself was dismissed on 20.4.1991 putting an end to the order appointing receiver in place of the first board of trustees.
(ii) Application made by the District Government Pleade
N. Mohanan Versus State of Kerala
Karnataka Rare Earth Vs. Senior Geologist
M. M. Thomas Vs. State of Kerala
N. Mohanan V s. State of Kerala
Ramchandra Ganpat Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra
Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Pravinbhai Jasbhai Patel
Shri. Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Vs. Church of South India Trust Association CSI Cinod Secretariat, Madras
Shyam Sunder Datta Vs. Baikuntha Nath Banerjee (Dead) By Lrs. 1994(6) SCC 545
South Eastern Coal Field Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. 2003(8) SCC 648
State of M.P. Vs. M.V. Vyavsaya & Co.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Singh
A.V. Papayya Sastry Vs. Govt. of A.P. 2007 ALL SCR 1363 : 2007(4) SCC 221
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.