2012 Supreme(Bom) 1505
High Court of Judicature at Bombay
A.S. OKA & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
The State of Maharashtra & Others
Versus
Shri Chandrakant Mangilal Samdadia & Others
FIRST APPEAL NOS.261 OF 2007, 262 OF 2007, 263 OF 2007, 1070 OF 2005, 264 OF 2007, 1071 OF 2005, 293 OF 2007, 186 OF 2003, 294 OF 2007, 190 OF 2003, 295 OF 2007, 1073 OF 2005, 265 OF 2007, 178 OF 2003, 266 OF 2007, 267 OF
2007, 268 OF 2007, 179 OF 2003, 269 OF 2007, 180 OF 2003, 296 OF 2007, 188 OF 2003, 297 OF 2007, 192 OF 2003, 298 OF 2007, 177 OF 2003, 1579 OF 2007, 1072 OF 2005, 1578 OF 2007, 185 OF 2003, 1577 OF 2007, 184 OF 2003, 1580 OF 2007,191 OF 2003, 1468 OF 2007, 189 OF 2003
Decided on : 10-08-2012
For the Appellants:P.B. Shah, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, P.N. Joshi, Advocate.
Headnote:Land Acquisition Act (1894), S.28 – Acquisition of land--- Market value determined on basis of market value of land having fruit bearing trees - No separate compensation can be granted on account of loss of fruit bearing trees---Interest is payable on the excess amount granted by Reference Court under all three components i.e. market value , solatium and interest under S.23(1-A) - Claimant is entitled to interest under all the three heads as a matter of right. (Paras 20 to 23)
A.S. Oka, J.
This group of First Appeals can be disposed of by a common judgment and order. As some of the Appeals pertain to jurisdiction of learned Single Judge, an order dated 16th July, 2012 has been passed by Hon'ble the Chief Justice assigning these Appeals to this Court. These Appeals consist of two groups. One group of the Appeals is First Appeal No.699 of 2002 alongwith the First Appeal Nos.1053 of 2009 to 1056 of 2009. In these Appeals, the challenge is to the judgment and award dated 21st December, 2000 passed by the learned Joint District Judge in Land Acquisition Reference Nos.264 of 1993 to 267 of 1993. The remaining Appeals out of this group of First Appeals arise out of a common judgment and award dated 30th April, 2001 in Land Acquisition Reference Nos. 213 of 1994 to 232 of 1994, 128 of 1995, 129 of 1995, 72 of 1996 and 28 of 2001. All the aforesaid references are under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”).
FACTS OF GROUP I
2. The lands subject matter of the first group of First Appeals being First Appeal No.699 of 2002 and First Appeal Nos.1053 of 2009 to 1056 of 2009 are situated at Male-Dumale, Taluka Dindori, District – Nashik. The lands were notified under a Notification under Section 4(1) of the said Act which was published in Government Gazette dated 4th January, 1990. The purpose of acquisition was construction of the Punegaon Dam. The acquired lands subject matter of the said References are the agricultural lands. The awards under Section 11 of the said Act were made on 23rd January, 1993. While offering compensation by the award under Section 11 of the said Act, the Special Land Acquisition Officer divided the acquired lands into four categories viz. Jirayat-I, Jirayat-II, Jirayat-III and Jirayat-IV. The market value offered by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for the said categories is as under:
1. Jirayat –I Rs.19,000/-Per Hectare
2. Jirayat –II Rs.21,000/-Per Hectare
3. Jirayat –III Rs.23,000/-Per Hectare
4. Jirayat –IV Rs.25,000/-Per Hectare
The Pot kharaba land was valued at Rs.200/-Per Hectare. The Special Land Acquisition Officer offered compensation for the wells and structures separately as per the valuation made by the Competent Authority. The Special Land Acquisition Officer accepted the valuation of trees/orchards on the acquired lands made by the Horticultural Department and compensation was offered accordingly for trees/orchards.
As far as fuel trees are concerned, no compensation was offered. The Claimants did not accept the compensation offered by the Award under Section 11 of the said Act and at their instance, references were made under Section 18 of the said Act. By the impugned judgments and awards, the learned Trial Judge came to the conclusion that in case of the lands falling in Bagayat –III, the market value will be Rs.1,33,000/-Per Hectare. On that basis, the learned Trial Judge determined the market value of various categories of the lands.
1. Jirayat –I Rs.86,000/-Per Hectare
2. Jirayat –II Rs.88,000/-Per Hectare
3. Jirayat –III Rs.90,000/-Per Hectare
4. Bagayat –I Rs.1,29,000/-Per Hectare
5. Bagayat II Rs.1,31,000/-Per Hectare
6. Bagayat III Rs.1,33,000/-Per Hectare
7. Bagayat IV Rs.1,35,000/-Per Hectare
3. The learned Trial Judge did not grant any enhanced compensation on account of trees/orchards, wells and structures. The learned Judge observed that as far as the valuation of Pot kharaba land at Rs.200/-Per Hectare made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer is concerned, none of the Claimants have either pleaded or proved that the said rate was inadequate. The learned Judge granted statutory benefits under Section 23(1A) and Section 23(2) of the said Act. The learned Judge also granted statutory benefit under Section 28 of the said Act. However, the benefit of interest under Section 28 was granted only on the component of excess land value and not on the other two components under Section 23(2) and Se