A.S.OKA, G.S.GODBOLE
Trambak Balaji Sangale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
G.S. GODBOLE, J.
1. All these Appeals are being heard and disposed of by a common Judgment since common questions of law and facts are involved and since all the Advocates appearing in the Appeals have specifically requested for deciding the Appeals by a common Judgment. All the Appeals are filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) read with the provisions of the Maharashtra Industrial Disputes Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “MID Act, 1961”).
2. Initially all these Appeals were decided by the Division Bench (Swatanter Kumar, CJ as he then was and J.P. Devadhar, J.) by Judgment and Order dated 10th April, 2008 and it was held that the References made under Section 34 (1) of the MID Act, 1961 were barred by time except Appeal Nos. 1776, 1779, 1782, 1784, 1794, 1797, 1818, 1832, 1837, 1840, 1844 and 1847 of 2003 which Appeals were remanded to the Reference Court for deciding the question of limitation of the References and for determining the compensation afresh.
3. Aggrieved by these orders, the original claimants had filed Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal in the Supreme Court of India being SLP Nos. 20689 a
Anjani Molu Dessai V State of Goa & anr. 2010 DGLS (Soft.) 2357 = 2010 (13) Scale 524
State of Punjab V Hans Raj (1994) 5 SCC 734
Lucknow Development Authority V Krishna Gopal Lahori & ors. AIR 2008 SC 399
Trishala Jain & anr. V State of Uttaranchal & anr. 2011 (6) SCC 47
Valliyammal & anr. V Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) & anr. (2011) 8 SCC 91
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.