SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 493

S.J.VAZIFDAR
Charu K. Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff :J.P. Cama, senior counsel with Raj Patel, Karl Tamboly, Rizvi Nasir Ali and H.N. Thakore i/b Thakore Jariwalla & Associates, Advocates.
For the Defendant:D1, D8 & D9, Dinyar Madon, senior counsel with Pranaya Goyal, Ms. Payal Shah i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co., D2, Ms. Rajni Iyer, senior counsel i/b VNA Legal. D3, Prateek Sakseria with Ms. Jyoti Shah, Ms. Jesal Shah i/b Daru Shah & Co., D5, D6, D7, & D11, Iqbal Chagla, senior counsel with Dhirendra Sinha i/b Vidhi Partners, D12, D14 & D15, Kevic Setalwad, senior counsel with Dakshesh Vyas, Ms. Sushma Nagraj & Nagendra Dube i/b Lex Firms, D10, Dr. Poornima Advani, Himanshu Kode, Omprakash Jha i/b Law Point, D13 & D16 Pranav Badheka i/b Parag Sharma, Advocates.

Judgment

1. This is an Originating Summons filed under Rule 238 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”).

2. The plaintiff and defendant Nos.2 and 3 are the permanent trustees of the first defendant trust which was established under an indenture of trust dated 5th July, 1978 and which is registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 (BPT Act). Defendant Nos.4 to 11 are described by the plaintiff as purported trustees. Defendant Nos.12, 13 and 14 are also permanent trustees. Defendant Nos.15 and 16 are described as term trustees. Defendant Nos.1, 3 and 5 to 11 are the contesting defendants. The remaining defendants support the plaintiff.

3(A). On 12th December, 2011, a preliminary objection as to jurisdiction under section 80 of the BPT Act was raised. During the course of the arguments on the preliminary issue, Mr. Chagla also raised another preliminary objection under section 51 of the BPT Act. I answered the preliminary issues in the negative and directed the parties to address me on the merits stating that I would give my reasons for the decision on the preliminary issues while dealing with the merits. While replying to the
























































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top